Reamed Nailing Versus Taylor Spatial Frame in Tibia Shaft Fractures

NCT03388879 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 65

Last updated 2018-01-03

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This is a randomised, bi-centre, prospective, clinical trial in patients with closed tibia shaft fractures. The fracture should be fresh/acute and seen within 3 weeks after the injury. Patients will be randomised to surgery with either a Taylor Spatial Frame (Smith \& Nephew, England) or a reamed intramedullar nail (according to local choice) with locking screws. Primary outcome measure is the physical component summary (PCS) of RAND Short form 36 (SF-36) after 2 years. Among secondary outcomes: Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, complications, healing, malunion, and resource use.

Conditions

  • Tibial Fractures

Interventions

DEVICE

Taylor Spatial Frame

Circular external fixator

DEVICE

Intramedullary nail

Antegrade intramedullary nail

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital

    collaborator OTHER
  • Oslo University Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Jan E Madsen, PhD · Professor, head of research group

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
70 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2010-10-31
Primary Completion
2015-06-16
Completion
2016-06-21

Countries

  • Norway

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03388879 on ClinicalTrials.gov