Ultrasound Guided Versus Landmark Guided Arterial Line Placement by Emergency Medicine Interns
NCT03326739 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 40
Last updated 2020-01-22
Summary
Critically ill patients in the emergency department commonly require arterial line placement for continuous direct blood pressure monitoring, frequent arterial blood gas sampling, and frequent blood sampling. Trans-radial catheterization has been shown to reduce access site complications and increase patient comfort compared to trans-femoral access. Radial artery access on the first attempt is optimal; attempts at reentry delay care and increase the risk of vascular spasm, hematoma, infection, neurovascular injury, and pain. The traditional pulse palpation method of radial artery cannulation can be challenging, especially in patients with weak pulses (i.e. morbidly obese or hypotensive individuals).
A review of literature suggests that ultrasound guided trans-radial catheterization compared to standard pulse palpation reduces access time and increases rate of first-entry success when performed by physicians trained in ultrasound. Thus, complications ascribed to reentry are prevented and timely care is provided.
To the investigator's knowledge, only one other prospective study has been conducted to assess the utility of ultrasound guided radial artery cannulation in the emergency department. Due to the paucity of literature to support the use of ultrasound guided trans-radial catheterization in critically ill patients, the study will aim to provide further data on the topic. Both techniques are considered standard of care.
Conditions
- Vascular Access Complication
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Arterial Line Placement
arterial line placement
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Temple University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Ryan C Gibbons, MD · Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 99 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2017-01-01
- Primary Completion
- 2019-12-31
- Completion
- 2019-12-31
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Ultrasound-guided Axillary Vein Catheterization in Trauma
NCT05896735 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Superior Venous Access, Midline vs Ultrasound IVs
NCT03440944 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
An Infraclavicular Landmark-based Approach to the Axillary Vein
NCT02083458 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Complications According to Ultrasound-guided Central Venous Catheters Insertion Site: a Non-inferiority Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT02975622 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Perspective Midline Catheter in the Emergency Department
NCT05607238 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Facilitating Needle Alignment With Aiming Method
NCT03778437 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound Guided Central Venous Vascular Access - Novel Needle Navigation Technology Compared With Conventional Method
NCT03214575 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Long Versus Short Axis Approach for Ultrasound Guided Peripheral Intravenous Access
NCT04234347 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound-guided Peripheral IJ Study
NCT03231345 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Single Lumen Midline Catheter vs Long Peripheral Intravenous Cather for Difficult Intravenous Access in the ED
NCT06668766 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound Guidance for Intravenous Cannulation in Emergency Department Patients.
NCT00692549 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficiency, and Emergency Department Nurse Preference Between 2 Methods of Visualization: A Pilot Study
NCT04811430 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Femoral Arterial Access With Ultrasound Trial
NCT00667381 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound Guided Peripheral IV Insertion
NCT03841864 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
"Syringe Free" Long-Axis In-Plane vs. Short-Axis Out-of-Plane Approach for Central Venous Catheter Placement
NCT04684069 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound Guided Axillary Versus Jugular Central Venous Catheterization
NCT02624323 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound Guided Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Insertion in the Hospitalized Patient: Long vs. Short Axis Placement
NCT01870661 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Venous Access Using AccuCath
NCT02469038 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Difference in Subclavian Vein Catheterization Between Supine and Lateral Tilt Position - Stage I
NCT03296735 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound-guided Catheterization of the Axillary Vein
NCT01919528 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound-image Guided Versus Doppler Guided Versus Palpation Technique for Arterial Cannulation in Adults
NCT01276171 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound Guided Subclavian Vein Cannulation at Emergency Room
NCT05107089 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Comparison of the Proximal Approach and Distal Approach of Axillary Vein Catheterization Under Ultrasound Guidance
NCT03395691 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound vs Veinviewer in Patients With Difficulty IV Access
NCT02618252 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Pre-hospital Ultrasound Guided Peripheral Venous Catheter Insertion
NCT03709394 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA