Evaluate Initial Success Rate of Ultrasound Guided Versus Landmark Approach For Peripheral Intravenous Access
NCT01859559 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 1189
Last updated 2018-12-07
Summary
The primary objective of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to compare the success rate of obtaining peripheral vascular access with ultrasound guidance versus the traditional, landmark approach among patients with varying degrees of intravenous access difficulty. In addition to comparing overall initial success rates of the two methods, we will also compare the success rates by degree of intravenous access difficulty (3 main subject subgroups) and by operator experience (approximately 20 emergency department technicians).
The main hypothesis is that the initial success rate will be significantly higher (5% or greater) for ultrasound guided peripheral intravenous access compared to landmark approach among patients who are judged to have difficult intravenous access but no significant difference (i.e. \< 5%) among patients judged to have easy intravenous access.
Conditions
- Patients With Peripheral Intravenous Access Lines
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous access line placement
The ED technician will use an ultrasound machine with a vascular probe to visualize the vein and guide the PIV line using a one-operator dynamic technique.
- PROCEDURE
-
Landmark Approach to peripheral intravenous access line placement
ED technician will use standard anatomical landmarks and palpation to puncture the skin and insert the peripheral intravenous access line in the upper extremity.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- collaborator OTHER
-
George Washington University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Melissa L McCarthy, ScD · George Washington University
-
Hamid Shokoohi, MD · George Washington University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2013-08-31
- Primary Completion
- 2014-08-31
- Completion
- 2014-09-30
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Efficiency, and Emergency Department Nurse Preference Between 2 Methods of Visualization: A Pilot Study
NCT04811430 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Ultrasound Guided Versus Landmark Guided Arterial Line Placement by Emergency Medicine Interns
NCT03326739 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound-guided Peripheral IJ Study
NCT03231345 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Controlled Trial of Ultrasound-guided Versus Landmark Technique for Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) Placement
NCT02859987 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Single v Dual-Operator Ultrasound Technique for Peripheral Vascular Access in the Emergency Department
NCT02806180 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Superior Venous Access, Midline vs Ultrasound IVs
NCT03440944 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
The "Peripheral Access Utilizing Sonographic Evaluation" Study
NCT02360163 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Venous Access Using AccuCath
NCT02469038 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Use of Static Ultrasound Guidance for Internal Jugular Vein Cannulation in Adult Cardiac Surgical Patients
NCT02185664 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Study of the Effectiveness of Central Line Placement Using an Ultraportable Ultrasound Device
NCT05692310 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Pre-hospital Ultrasound Guided Peripheral Venous Catheter Insertion
NCT03709394 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
POCUS for Difficult Peripheral Access in the Emergency Department - a RCT
NCT05119673 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound Detection of Peripheral IV Infiltration
NCT01800552 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
The Second Try During Landmark Approach of the Internal Jugular Vein: an Ultrasonographic Prelocation Study
NCT02492932 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Traditional and Ultrasound-Guided Techniques for Vascular Access in Patients With Difficult Venous Access in Emergency Department.
NCT07013994 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Complications According to Ultrasound-guided Central Venous Catheters Insertion Site: a Non-inferiority Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT02975622 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Landmark vs. Ultrasound Guided SCVC in the ED
NCT01914705 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Ultrasound-guided Insertion on Peripheral Catheters Related Complications.
NCT05284422 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound Guided Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Insertion in the Hospitalized Patient: Long vs. Short Axis Placement
NCT01870661 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Long Versus Short Axis Approach for Ultrasound Guided Peripheral Intravenous Access
NCT04234347 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Intraosseous Versus Intravenous Vascular Access During Cardiac Arrest
NCT01119807 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound vs Veinviewer in Patients With Difficulty IV Access
NCT02618252 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Site of Puncture in Prelocation Technique of the Internal Jugular Venous Catheterization
NCT02878174 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Axillary Versus Subclavian Vein Strategies for Central Venous Catheterization Under Continuous Ultrasound Guidance
NCT01543360 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Prospective Trial of Ultrasound Versus Landmark Guided Central Venous Access in the Pediatric Population
NCT01680666 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA