MedTrace Logo

Comparison of Two Methods for Bowel Preparation in Patients With Constipation

NCT03306030 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 140

Last updated 2017-11-28

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Constipation is a common high risk factor for inadequate bowel preparation. The bowel cleansing efficacy of the standard split-does of 4L seems to be suboptimal in constipated patients. The investigator hypothesized that compared with the standard preparation regime, the split-dose with three times of 4L PEG may be superior in BP quality.

Conditions

  • Health Behavior

Interventions

DRUG

Split dose of 4L PEG

All patients were given oral instruction for bowel preparation on the day of appointment and re-instruction through phone call on two days before scheduled colonoscopy. They were instructed to have a regular lunch and take only clear liquid or low-residual food for the dinner on the day before colonoscopy. The participants began to drink the first 2 L of PEG at 7:00-9 PM on the day before colonoscopy at a rate of 250 mL every 15 minutes. On the day of the procedure, patients took the remaining 2 L 4-6 hours before colonoscopy.

DRUG

Three times dose of 4L PEG

The same as mentioned above. The participants began to drink the first 1.5 L of PEG at 2:00 PM and the second 1.5L of PEG at 8:00PM on the day before colonoscopy at a rate of 250 mL every 15 minutes. On the day of the procedure, patients take the remaining 1.0 L 4-6 hours before colonoscopy.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Air Force Military Medical University, China

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
80 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2017-09-01
Primary Completion
2018-08-31
Completion
2018-11-30

Countries

  • China

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03306030 on ClinicalTrials.gov