MedTrace Logo

Magnetic Ureteral Stent Symptoms - a Comparison to Standard Ureteral Stent as Perceived By the Patient (MAGUSS)

NCT03257306 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 170

Last updated 2021-10-08

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The specific aim of this study is to validate our hypothesis that the magnetic ureteral stents have the same amount of adverse effects as the more commonly used non-magnetic ureteral stents. If this hypothesis would be confirmed then the usage of magnetic ureteral stents would be justified for both reducing patient discomfort by way of fewer cystoscopies and possibly also decreasing the overall expenditures of treatment.

Conditions

  • Urinary Tract Stone
  • Kidney Stone

Interventions

PROCEDURE

ureteral double-J stent removal using magnet

Double-J ureteric stent removed using magnet

PROCEDURE

ureteral double-J stent removal using cystoscopy

Double-J ureteric stent removed using cystoscopy

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Kuopio University Hospital

    collaborator OTHER

  • Satakunta Central Hospital

    collaborator OTHER

  • Jyväskylä Central Hospital

    collaborator OTHER

  • Turku University Hospital

    lead OTHER_GOV

Principal Investigators

  • Kari T Syvänen, MD, PhD · Turku University Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
85 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-11-09
Primary Completion
2022-12-31
Completion
2022-12-31

Countries

  • Finland

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03257306 on ClinicalTrials.gov