Comparing the Usability of an Electronic Bladder Diary and a Paper Bladder Diary

NCT03249987 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 18

Last updated 2018-09-10

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This piece of research is a single centre, two-way cross over, prospective study to compare the outcomes and experience of patients completing a paper bladder diary and an electronic version. This project aims to examine whether an electronic bladder diary can improve data quality compared to a paper bladder diary. Participants will attend an introduction appointment within the Urology Department at Royal Hallamshire Hospital. The participant will complete the bladder diaries at home and will then complete a questionnaire at the Royal Hallamshire Hospital.

Patients who are being sent an appointment for urodynamics (standard or video) will be also sent a recruitment letter and participant information sheet (PIS), to inform them of the study. One week later a member of the study team will phone the patient, to see if they are interested in participating in the study and assess the eligibility criteria. If that patient is interested and they fulfil the inclusion/exclusion criteria they will be invited to attend an introduction appointment. This will be conducted 1-2 weeks prior to the urodynamic test, at which point study details will be discussed and written informed consent will be taken. The participant will be taught how to use the digital and paper versions of the bladder diaries

Participants will be asked to complete the electronic diary for three days and the paper diary for three days. Half of the participants will complete the digital diary first, the other half will complete the paper diary first, and this will be done by alternating consecutively. Patients will be asked to record the time and volume of voids, any incontinence or urgency episodes and sleep-wake times. On the day of their urodynamics appointment, patients should return with their electronic and paper diaries

Conditions

  • Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

Interventions

OTHER

bladder diary

electronic diary to be completed for 3 days before crossover onto paper diary for 3 days

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Richard Inman · Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Model
CROSSOVER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-08-30
Primary Completion
2018-04-30
Completion
2018-04-30

Countries

  • United Kingdom

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03249987 on ClinicalTrials.gov