ACDF Comparison Trial
NCT03187171 · Status: WITHDRAWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL
Last updated 2019-05-13
Summary
This research protocol seeks to compare radiological and clinical outcomes of cervical spine disease patients following standard-of-care anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using allograft fusion versus Cohere porous polyetheretherketone (PEEK) fusion device.
This clinical study presents little to no additional risk to study subjects beyond those associated with standard-of-care ACDF surgery. Adults age 18 and over who are undergoing an ACDF procedure will be enrolled in the study. The study consists of a completing a series of questionnaires and obtaining radiographs. The primary endpoint of the study will be the rate of successful spinal fusion for each group. For evaluation of the primary endpoint and additional assessments, descriptive statistics including mean, standard deviation, minimum, median, and maximum for continuous variables and frequency distribution for categorical variables will be provided, as well as tabular listings. All complications will be itemized including incidence, duration, and relationship to the device used and/or procedures performed.
Conditions
- Cervical Spine Disc Disease
- Surgery
- Fusion of Spine
- Degenerative Disc Disease
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Allograft Fusion
ACDF is a surgical technique used to treat a variety of cervical spine disorders, such as nerve root or spinal cord compression, cervical spondylosis, and cervical spinal stenosis. The anterior approach to the cervical spine for discectomy and fusion by the insertion of an autologous iliac crest tricortical bone graft was first described by Robinson and Smith in 1955. In 1958, Cloward described a wide anterior cylindrical discectomy performed with a special reamer combined with anterior fusion by the insertion of autologous iliac bone graft of the same shape. At Duke University Health Systems, both allografts and Cohere porous PEEK fusion device are used for ACDF.
- DEVICE
-
Cohere PEEK Fusion Group
Bagby et al. developed the first interbody fusion cage. Cages of different shapes and materials are used to perform ACDF which, in some cases, could be associated with plate fixation. At Duke University Health Systems, both allografts and Cohere porous PEEK fusion device are used for ACDF.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Michael Haglund, MD · Duke University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 99 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2018-12-01
- Primary Completion
- 2019-04-23
- Completion
- 2019-04-23
- FDA Device
- Yes
More Related Trials
-
Fusion Status After ACDF
NCT05986006 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Performance of the Hedrocel(R) Cervical Fusion Device
NCT00758758 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Evaluation of Fusion Rate of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) Using Cervios ChronOs™ and Bonion™
NCT01615328 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Cervical I/F Cage for Anterior Cervical Fusion
NCT00215293 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
The Norwegian Cervical Arthroplasty Trial
NCT00735176 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Advent™ Cervical Disc Versus ACDF for Treatment of One Level Degenerative Disc Disease (IDE Study)
NCT00637312 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
The Collar Post Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery Study
NCT03842072 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
PEEK and Allograft Spacers Evaluation in Spinal Fusion Surgeries
NCT01406405 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Impact of Lateral Bone Grafting With Intraoperative Fusion in ACDF on Clinical Outcomes
NCT06027827 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Post-operative Outcomes of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery With and Without Drain Placement
NCT06938607 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Exploratory Study of 3D Printed Biodegradable Cervical Interbody Fusion Cage
NCT04167878 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Comparative Analysis of ACDF vs Fusion Interbody Cages With nanoLOCK Osseointegrative Technology
NCT05762055 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Interbody Fusion Devices in the Treatment of Cervicobrachial Syndrome
NCT01511445 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cervical Foraminal Stenosis and Radiculopathy - ACDF Versus Minimal Invasive Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy.
NCT02350621 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Outcomes Study Evaluating the Zero-P PEEK
NCT00945243 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
A Prospective Study of NuCel® in Cervical Spine Fusion
NCT02381067 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Allogeinic Bone Paste
NCT04605120 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of the Artificial Cervical Disc - Low Profile Device at Two Adjacent Levels
NCT00637156 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Adjacent Level Anterior Cervical Fusion: SeaSpine Shoreline Versus Removal of Previously Implanted Plate and Replating
NCT06415136 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
-
Evaluation of Bone Union Following Anterior Cervical Fusion Using a NovoMax™
NCT02425514 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Safety and Efficacy Study Comparing ProDisc-C to ACDF Surgery to Treat SCDD
NCT00291018 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Study of Fusion Rates Using Spira-C Device for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery
NCT03786432 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Prognostic Factors for ACDF With BAK/C in Cervical Disc Disease
NCT07069114 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Lumbar Fusion With Nexxt Spine 3D-Printed Titanium Interbody Cages
NCT03647501 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiological Outcomes: Two-level Cervical ProDisc-C Vivo Versus Hybrid Construct.
NCT03367052 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA