Identification of Microcirculation and Inflammation After Minimal-invasive Osteosynthesis of the Proximal Femur

NCT01264172 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50

Last updated 2012-11-27

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This project investigate any difference in inflammatory response,wound heeling rate, functional outcome and level of pain in patience with different surgical treatment (PCCT vs. DHS vs. Osteosynthesis with nails) after a fracture of the proximal femur.

Conditions

  • Level of Pain

Interventions

PROCEDURE

PCCP

PCCP: an minimal-invasive surgery technique, in wich a special plate is pushed in position and fixed through 2 small approaches only (about 2 cm long)

PROCEDURE

DHS

Conventional surgical treatment of proximal femur fracture including one longer approach from lateral

PROCEDURE

Osteosynthesis with nails

Osteosynthesis with nails is a minimal-invasive surgery technique for proximal femur fractures.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • RWTH Aachen University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Hans-Christoph Pape, Univ-prof.MD · Chief of medicine

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
60 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2010-12-31
Primary Completion
2012-11-30
Completion
2012-11-30

Countries

  • Germany

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01264172 on ClinicalTrials.gov