Trial Outcomes & Findings for Comparison of Post Tooth Extraction Healing Using Different Xenograft Materials (NCT NCT03149172)

NCT ID: NCT03149172

Last Updated: 2020-09-25

Results Overview

Histomorphometric determination of % new bone formation

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

25 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

4-6 months after ridge preservation surgery

Results posted on

2020-09-25

Participant Flow

25 subjects were screened. However, only 21 subjects were enrolled. 4 patients didn't participate the study.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Equimatrix®
Equimatrix® + Mucograft or alternatives Equimatrix®: Ridge preservation bone grafting after tooth extraction
Bio-Oss®
Bio-Oss® + Mucograft or alternatives Bio-Oss®: Ridge preservation bone grafting after tooth extraction
Endobon®
Endobon® + Mucograft or alternatives Endobon®: Ridge preservation bone grafting after tooth extraction
Overall Study
STARTED
8
6
7
Overall Study
COMPLETED
6
5
5
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
2
1
2

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Comparison of Post Tooth Extraction Healing Using Different Xenograft Materials

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Equimatrix®
n=8 Participants
Equimatrix® + Mucograft or alternatives Equimatrix®: Ridge preservation bone grafting after tooth extraction
Bio-Oss®
n=6 Participants
Bio-Oss® + Mucograft or alternatives Bio-Oss®: Ridge preservation bone grafting after tooth extraction
Endobon®
n=7 Participants
Endobon® + Mucograft or alternatives Endobon®: Ridge preservation bone grafting after tooth extraction
Total
n=21 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
5 Participants
n=99 Participants
4 Participants
n=107 Participants
7 Participants
n=206 Participants
16 Participants
n=7 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
3 Participants
n=99 Participants
2 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
Age, Continuous
60.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7 • n=99 Participants
55.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6 • n=107 Participants
53.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1 • n=206 Participants
56.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.0 • n=7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants
n=99 Participants
3 Participants
n=107 Participants
2 Participants
n=206 Participants
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants
n=99 Participants
3 Participants
n=107 Participants
5 Participants
n=206 Participants
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
8 participants
n=99 Participants
6 participants
n=107 Participants
7 participants
n=206 Participants
21 participants
n=7 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 4-6 months after ridge preservation surgery

Histomorphometric determination of % new bone formation

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Equimatrix®
n=6 Participants
Equimatrix® + Mucograft or alternatives Equimatrix®: Ridge preservation bone grafting after tooth extraction
Bio-Oss®
n=5 Participants
Bio-Oss® + Mucograft or alternatives Bio-Oss®: Ridge preservation bone grafting after tooth extraction
Endobon®
n=5 Participants
Endobon® + Mucograft or alternatives Endobon®: Ridge preservation bone grafting after tooth extraction
Percent New Bone Formation
41 percentage of new bone formation
Standard Deviation 30
25 percentage of new bone formation
Standard Deviation 18
26 percentage of new bone formation
Standard Deviation 26

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 4-6 months after ridge preservation surgery

Population: The micro-CT data was anaylzed as a preliminary outcome of the primary outcome. A total of 10 patient data was used.

Measured by Micro CT Scanning

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Equimatrix®
n=3 Participants
Equimatrix® + Mucograft or alternatives Equimatrix®: Ridge preservation bone grafting after tooth extraction
Bio-Oss®
n=3 Participants
Bio-Oss® + Mucograft or alternatives Bio-Oss®: Ridge preservation bone grafting after tooth extraction
Endobon®
n=4 Participants
Endobon® + Mucograft or alternatives Endobon®: Ridge preservation bone grafting after tooth extraction
Bone Density
25.6 percentage of bone volume
Standard Deviation 18.7
23.0 percentage of bone volume
Standard Deviation 7.9
12.9 percentage of bone volume
Standard Deviation 11.1

Adverse Events

Equimatrix®

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Bio-Oss®

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Endobon®

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Dr. Yong Hur

Tufts University

Phone: 6176366531

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place