Does 3D Visualisation Improve Performance of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy by Junior Surgeons?
NCT03143426 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 100
Last updated 2018-01-26
Summary
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is currently the most commonly performed major abdominal surgery in Western countries. Ever since the introduction of laparoscopic surgery in the late 1980s, cholecystectomies are now routinely performed laparoscopically; concomitantly the introduction and refinement of other laparoscopic abdominal surgeries have rapidly progressed due to the early experience and safety profile seen in LC.
The introduction of stereoscopes which allow for 3D visual feedback has been postulated to overcome setbacks encountered in conventional 2-dimensional (2D) laparoscopic surgery. Since its introduction in the mid-2000s, 3D visualisation has been proven to be advantageous over 2D visualisation, especially so within the context of training junior surgeons in controlled, experimental settings. The body of evidence on benefits of 3D visualisation within the clinical setting, i.e. when applied on live patients in operating theatres, remains small and weak. The previous publications however did not extrapolate any potential benefits on patients' well-being in correlation to their reported benefits and neither did they explore any potential benefits in reducing operative complications.
We decided to embark on a study to investigate any peri-operative advantage conferred on junior surgeons in performing LC using 3D visualisation as the majority of LCs in Sibu Hospital are carried out by junior surgeons.
Conditions
- Complication Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
- Conversion Laparoscopic to Open Cholecystectomy
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
3D laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy will be performed under 3D visualization as opposed to 2D visualization (conventional method). 3D supposedly provide sharper view with better depth perception and therefore might lead to reduce complication rates.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Clinical Research Centre, Malaysia
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Chan Hooi Chea, MS · Ministry of Health, Malaysia
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2017-04-01
- Primary Completion
- 2017-09-30
- Completion
- 2017-09-30
Countries
- Malaysia
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
The Real World of Acute Cholecystitis
NCT02796443 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
3D vs 2D HD Laparoscopy in Cholecystectomy
NCT02357589 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prolonged Versus Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis
NCT05736003 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Open Cholecystectomy Among Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.
NCT05366907 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Children. Risk Factors for Conversion. A Prospective Study .
NCT06048029 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Lower Abdominal Three-port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT02185586 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Drainage or Not for Laparoscopic Cholecystetomy
NCT03909360 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
3D HD Versus 2D HD in Cholecystectomy
NCT02396927 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy is no More Risky in Emergent Cases With in Cardiopulmonary Risk: Fundus-Callot Cholecystectomy With Low Pressure Pneumo-peritoneum VS Open Cholecystectomy
NCT04373447 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Optimizing the Consent Process for Emergent Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT04852016 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic Assisted Versus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy - Outcome and Cost Analyses of a Case-Matched Control Study
NCT00562900 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Three Dimension Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Gallbladder Carcinoma
NCT03491878 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Optimum-pressure for Reducing Postoperative Shoulder-tip Pain in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT04212936 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Risk Factors Leading to Conversion From Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy to Open Surgery
NCT06244589 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Video-Assisted Education After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT07277036 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Optimal Timing for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy After Cholecystostomy in Acute Cholecystitis Tokyo II/III Setting
NCT06476054 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Traditional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT01195285 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Three Ports and Four Ports Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT06873594 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Surgical Techniques: Robotic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy IN Benign Gallbladder Disease
NCT07119203 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Structured Remote Surgical Coaching to Improve Operative Performance in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT04512560 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Intraoperative Spillage of Bile and Gallstones During Laparoscopic Cholecysetectomy
NCT04041726 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Cholecyst- Versus Cystic Duct Cholangiography During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT01103570 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
The Clinical Outcomes of the Percutaneous Cholecystostomy, Supportive Care Versus Cholecystectomy.
NCT01894321 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Low-pressure vs Standard-pressure in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT04146090 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Use of Robotics for Cholecystectomy; Retrospective Review of Outcomes, Set Up and Learning Curves
NCT03059745 ·Status: COMPLETED