Comparison of Duodenal Stenting vs Transpyloric and Duodenal Stenting for Malignant Obstruction

NCT03125148 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 17

Last updated 2022-05-27

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

Malignant duodenal obstruction in patients not fit for surgery is treated by placing enteral stents during endoscopy. These patients may also have poor gastric motility. Hence bridging the pyloric opening with the stent along with the duodenal obstruction may deliver better symptomatic improvement. Both approaches are commonly clinically practiced but no formal comparative studies have been done to compare which one is better.

Conditions

  • Duodenal Obstruction

Interventions

DEVICE

Enteral stenting

Enteral stent for malignant duodenal obstruction

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Medical College of Wisconsin

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Mark Rusch, PhD · Medical College of Wisconsin

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2017-05-27
Primary Completion
2019-11-15
Completion
2019-11-15
FDA Device
Yes

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03125148 on ClinicalTrials.gov