Uncovered Self-expandable Metal Stent Versus Double Layer Plastic Stent for Malignant Hilar Stricture
NCT01125865 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 100
Last updated 2011-03-10
Summary
The overall median survival of nonresectable malignant hilar obstruction in most series has been less than 6 months. Most patients with malignant hilar obstruction present with advanced disease, making palliative endoscopic drainage the principal therapeutic option. However, the optimal endoscopic management strategy is contentious. Almost all of the published data comparing plastic and metallic stents relate to distal tumors (those of the pancreas, common bile duct and ampulla). Stent patency, complication rates, and cost-effectiveness have favored metallic stents when compared with plastic stents in patients with distal malignant obstruction expected to live at least 3 to 6 months.
There are few comparative study as to whether self-expanding metallic or plastic stent, especially DLS (double layer plastic stent) are preferable in the technical success, stent patency, and cost-effectiveness for palliating malignant hilar obstruction.
The study was designed to compare the the technical success, stent patency, and cost-effectiveness of self-expandable metal stent and DLS in patients with malignant hilar obstruction.
Conditions
- Bile Duct Obstruction
- Klatskin's Tumor
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
SEMS insertion
Self-expandable metallic stent will be inserted for malignant hilar obstruction.
- DEVICE
-
DLS insertion
DoubleLayer plastic stent will be inserted for malignant hilar obstruction.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Soon Chun Hyang University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2010-05-31
- Primary Completion
- 2011-07-31
- Completion
- 2011-12-31
Countries
- South Korea
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
A Comparison of a Fully Covered Self-expandable Metal Stent With an External Anchoring Plastic Stent and Uncovered Stent
NCT05220475 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Study for Efficacy of Side-by-side Compared to Stent-in-stent Technique in the Endoscopic Management of Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction
NCT02659852 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Partial Covered Double Bare Metal Stent Compared to Uncovered Double Bare Metal Stent in Malignant Biliary Obstruction
NCT02937246 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Transpapillary and Suprapapillary Metal Stent
NCT04503291 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Two-in-one Covered and Uncovered Metal Stent
NCT04337333 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Covered Self-expandable Metallic Stent (SEMS) Above/Across the Sphincter of Oddi
NCT01041612 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Fully Covered SEMS Versus Partially Covered SEMS With Anti-migration System for Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction
NCT02255669 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Covered vs. Uncovered SEMS for Occluded Biliary Metal Stents
NCT01315522 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Outcome Study of Double Bare Stent for Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction
NCT02156505 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Percutaneous Bilateral Versus Unilateral Metal Stent for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma
NCT02108145 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
A Prospective Randomized Study for Efficacy of Uncovered Double Bare Metallic Stent Compared to Uncovered Single Bare Metallic Stent in Malignant Biliary Obstruction
NCT01869894 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Unilateral Stenting Versus Bilateral Stenting for Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction
NCT02649712 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Distal Malignant Biliary Obstruction by Uncovered, Partially Covered, or Fully Covered Metal Stents
NCT06453590 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Covered vs Uncovered Metal Stents for Palliative Biliary Decompression in Inoperable Malignant Distal Bile Duct Obstruction
NCT01905384 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy and Cost Analysis of Plastic Stent Compare to Metallic Stent in Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma
NCT00721175 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison Between Novel Flower-type Covered Stent and Conventional Covered Stent
NCT03215108 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Self-expandable Metal Stents Versus Multiple Plastic Stents for Palliation of Biliary Obstruction
NCT03821025 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Partially Covered Metal Stents Efficacy in Biliary Drainage of Malignant Extra-hepatic Biliary Obstruction
NCT04431427 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Two Methods of Bilateral Stenting for Malignant Hilar Obstruction
NCT01622803 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Radiation Stent Versus Self-expanding Metallic Stents (SEMS) for Palliative Treatment of Malignant Biliary Stricture
NCT01320241 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Comparison Between Fully Covered Metal Stents and Plastic Stents in Preoperative Biliary Drainage
NCT01789502 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Outcomes of EUS-guided Biliary Drainage Using Partially or Fully Covered Metallic Stents
NCT02114320 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Paclitaxel Eluting Covered Metallic Stent for Unresectable Malignant Bile Duct Obstruction
NCT00453076 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Covered Versus Uncovered Self-expandable Metallic Stents for Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction
NCT01646476 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Efficacy and Safety of a Fully Covered Self-Expandable Metal Stent for Unresectable HCC
NCT05729867 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA