A Randomized Controlled Crossover Study Comparing Sugammadex and Placebo
NCT03087513 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 40
Last updated 2020-06-17
Summary
Intraoperative monitoring of the motor evoked potentials has been shown to be both a sensitive and specific indicator for detecting intraoperative neurological injuries during spine surgery.(Fehlings, Brodke et al. 2010) It is utilized whenever there is risk for injury of nerve roots or the spinal cord during the procedure.
Anesthetic agents, especially the inhaled volatile anesthetics and muscle relaxants, are con-founders for motor evoked potential monitoring as they have deleterious effects on the amplitude of motor evoked potentials.(Sekimoto, Nishikawa et al. 2006) Hence, total intravenous anesthesia with no intraoperative muscle relaxants, are the standard anesthetic technique for these surgeries.
Muscle relaxants are usually required during the induction of anesthesia and endotracheal intubation of larynx. Current practice is to wait for the resolution of residual neuromuscular blockade before the motor evoked potential recordings (MEP) are initiated and this makes it difficult to assess if there was any neurological injury associated with positioning of the patient. A previous case series has shown that reversal of muscle relaxant can improve the amplitude of MEPs.(Batistaki, Papadopoulos et al. 2012) The aim of this study is to perform a randomized controlled trial to study the changes in motor evoked potential amplitudes comparing sugammadex and placebo.
Conditions
- Posterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion
Interventions
- DRUG
-
Sugammadex Injection [Bridion]
The study participants will receive 10 ml syringe containing Sugammadex (2mg/kg) in the first phase followed by Placebo 10 ml syringe containing of 0.9% of normal saline in the second phase.
- DRUG
-
The study participants will receive Placebo 10 ml syringe containing of 0.9% of normal saline in the first phase followed by 10 ml syringe containing Sugammadex (2mg/kg) in the second phase.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- collaborator INDUSTRY
-
University Health Network, Toronto
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Lashmi Venkatraghavan · University Health Network, Toronto
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Model
- CROSSOVER
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 80 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2018-02-05
- Primary Completion
- 2019-12-30
- Completion
- 2020-04-30
Countries
- Canada
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparative Study of Sugammadex Versus Neostigmine for Reversal of Neuromuscular Blockade in Morbidly Obese Patients
NCT01629394 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Effect of Neuromuscular Blockade on Operating Conditions and Overall Satisfaction During Spinal Surgery
NCT02724111 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Recovery of Muscle Function After Deep Neuromuscular Block by Means of Diaphragm Ultrasonography
NCT02698969 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Can Adequacy of Anesthesia Depth and Quality of Recovery be Influenced by the Level of Neuromuscular Blockade?
NCT02484651 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Brachial Plexus Block With EXPAREL in Shoulder Surgery
NCT02713230 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
The Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Brachial Plexus Block for Shoulder Surgery
NCT02225054 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Neuromuscular Blockade Improves Surgical Conditions
NCT00895778 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Reversal of Neuromuscular Blockade With Sugammadex or Usual Care in Hip Fracture Surgery or Joint (Hip/Knee) Replacement (P07038)
NCT01422304 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Effect of Superficial Cervical Plexus Block on the Postoperative Quality of Recovery
NCT01662219 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Incidence of Postoperative Residual Neuromuscular Blockade in the Era of Sugammadex
NCT05760560 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation: A Department of Defense Funded Pragmatic Clinical Trial
NCT04713098 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Opioid Sparing Effect of an ISP Nerve Block on Post-Op Pain Control in Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery
NCT06570577 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Retroclavicular Versus Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block for Hand and Forearm Surgery
NCT02641613 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
US-Guided Preemptive Brachial Plexus Blockade May Reduce Post-operative Pain: a Randomized Study
NCT04005534 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Analgesic Efficacy of Intermediate Cervical Plexus Block in Patients Undergoing Neck Surgeries: A Comparison Between Two Bupivacaine Concentrations
NCT06621836 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Bilateral Ultrasound Guided Superficial Cervical Plexus Block After Thyroid Surgery
NCT05476003 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Brachial Plexus Block on Diaphragm Movement
NCT06640621 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Pain Control Between 0.2 or 0.3 Spinal Morphine and 0.25 or 0.5 % Bupivacaine for FNB After TKA
NCT00795223 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Genicular Nerve Block for Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT03706313 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Ultrasound Guided Supraclavicular Nerve Block
NCT00825786 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Inter-semispinal Plane Block and Cervical Spine Surgery
NCT06003933 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Analgesic Efficacy of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine for Supraclavicular Plexus Block
NCT05389852 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
The Efficacy of Liposomal Bupivacaine in Ultrasound Guided Supraclavicular Nerve Blocks for Hand and Wrist Surgery
NCT06806410 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Superficial Cervical Plexus Block for Postoperative Analgesia
NCT04036812 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Femoral Nerve Block With EXPAREL in Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT02713178 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3