Long-term Evaluation Protocol (12 Months Postoperative) of Total Knee Prostheses Anatomic With Resurfaced Patella Versus Non-resurfaced Patella in Patients Requiring Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT03081260 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 250
Last updated 2025-10-03
Summary
Total knee arthroplasty is a frequent surgery in France. It currently represents 70,000 interventions per year. The total knee prosthesis is also called tri-compartmental because it allows articulation between the femur and the tibia but also between the femur and the patella.
The patella belongs to the extensor system. It articulates with the femoral trochlea in which it slides. It has an important biomechanical role on the quadriceps strength in addition to allowing flexion-extension movements.
In the case of resurfacing, the joint face of the patella is cut off; A convex polyethylene implant is sealed with cement using studs on the same face.
In case of non-resurfacing, the surgeon leaves in place the cartilage of the patella which will be in direct contact with the femoral prosthetic trochlea.
Both methods have advantages and disadvantages. For some implants, it is recommended to resurface the patella because the implant is not very tolerant with the native patella. Other implants have been designed to be better adapted to the preservation of patellar cartilage.
There is currently no evidence that one method is superior to the other on new generation implants known as "patellar friendly".
It seems necessary to compare both methods in terms of long-term postsurgery results.
Conditions
- Arthroplasty
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Patellar resurfacing
The resurfacing of the patella is generally done at the end of the surgery, after having ejected the patella. A frontal bone cut is made using a dedicated ancillary to remove the entire cartilage. Orifices are then made in the patella so that the polyethylene implant can be accommodated with studs which will be cemented on the joint face of the ball joint.
- OTHER
-
Patellar non-resurfacing
Non-resurfacing of the patella does not involve any additional surgical action
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Hospices Civils de Lyon
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Sebastien Lustig, MD · Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2017-04-03
- Primary Completion
- 2020-02-28
- Completion
- 2020-02-28
Countries
- France
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Risk of Osteoarthritis of the Knee at Least 5 Years After ACL Reconstruction: Comparative Study Between an Isolated ACL Reconstruction and a Reconstruction Combining ACL and ALL
NCT05123456 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Standard and Robot Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty with a Bicrucatie Retaining Prosthesis
NCT04334304 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Walking Analysis After a Total Knee Arthroplasty With Kinematic Alignment Versus Mechanical Alignment
NCT04226339 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Results of a Mobile Unicompartimental Knee Prosthesis
NCT03130309 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Observational Study to Evaluate Clinical Performance and Safety in Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT04872855 ·Status: TERMINATED
-
Study of the Clinical and Radiographic Results of a Fixed Polyethylene Posteriorly Stabilized Cemented Total Knee Prosthesis With a Minimum Follow-up of 1 Year.
NCT07313449 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Assessment of Patient Satisfaction After Arthroplasty: A Comparative Study by Implant Type
NCT04460989 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Total Knee Arthroplasty With the Medial-Pivot Knee System
NCT03677518 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of a Short Uncemented Femoral Stem to a Similar Standard Uncemented Femoral Stem
NCT03500926 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Survivorship and Outcomes of Robotically Assisted Patellofemoral UKA
NCT01947686 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Comparison of the Use of Conventional Ancillary Reaming and Single-use Ancillary Reaming Material in Total Hip Replacement
NCT04903860 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Analysis of the Functional Impact of Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Quantified Gait Analysis and Proprioceptive Evaluation
NCT06907368 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Comparative Study of Navigation-assisted OrthoPilot® Elite and Robotic-assisted MAKO® Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT05980442 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Choice of Material for Above-Knee Femoro-Popliteal Bypass Prosthetic Graft (PopUp)
NCT00300690 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Efficiency Assessment of the Methodology for the Follow-up of Patients With Knee Prostheses
NCT04850300 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Comparison of Highly Cross-Linked and Conventional Polyethylene in Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT02020057 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Fixed- Versus Mobile-bearing TKA
NCT00435357 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Anatomically Aligned and Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty in the Same Patients
NCT04181216 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment With Gait Analysis of Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Inverse Kinematic Alignment
NCT04912973 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Questionnaire and Radiography for Prosthesis Follow-up
NCT03745976 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Stability of Contemporary Knee Arthroplasty
NCT02861794 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Functional Recovery After Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT06821269 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Clinical and Radiological Impact of Tibial Cutting Int Total Knee Arthroplasty, Accelerated Navigation Versus Extramedullary Targeting
NCT03951545 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of Anatomically Aligned Versus Conventional in Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT04181528 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Cemented vs. Cementless TKA
NCT04597684 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA