Evaluation of the Incidence of Palatal Fistula in Furlow Double-opposing Z-plasty vs. Two-flap Palatoplasty for Cleft Palate Repair

NCT03055637 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 32

Last updated 2017-02-16

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Evaluation of the incidence of palatal fistula in Furlow double-opposing z-plasty versus two-flap palatoplasty for cleft palate repair.

Conditions

  • Fistula of Soft Palate (Disorder)

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Furlow double opposing z-plasty

\* Furlow, (1986) has described a technique for palatoplasty combining the principles of mucosal lengthening with creation of an intact muscular sling in the palate with double opposing Z-plasty. On the soft palate, mirror image Z-plasties are drawn, one for the nasal musoca and the other oral flaps, the nasal flaps are developed and closed first .The oral flaps are then approximated. The defect created usually closes readily. The closure lines of the two soft plate layers do not overlap, minimizing the potential for contracture. Also, this repair permits closure of the hard palate without lateral incisions

PROCEDURE

Two flap palatoplasty

design the 2-flap palatoplasty, with a 2-layer closure in the hard palate and 3-layer closure in the soft palate,

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Sarah Moustafa Mahmoud Fahmy El-Youtti

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
9 Months
Max Age
12 Months
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2017-02-19
Primary Completion
2017-05-19
Completion
2017-05-19

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03055637 on ClinicalTrials.gov