Pudendal Block Versus Penian Block For Circumcision In Children

NCT03046290 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2017-02-08

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The authors study the efficacy of the pudendal versus penile block for the relief of postoperative pain in children receiving ambulatory circumcision.

In this prospective, double-blind, randomized, parallel-arm trial, 60 children recruited during the anesthesia consultation will be allocated a general anesthesia with a pudendal block (PUD group) or a penile block (PEN group).

Each block will be made with equal parts lidocaine 1% and ropivacaine 0.75% (0.3 ml/kg).

Conditions

  • Regional Anesthesia
  • Postoperative Pain
  • Circumcision

Interventions

PROCEDURE

circumcision

DRUG

Lidocaine

DRUG

Ropivacaine

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Université Libre de Bruxelles

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
TRIPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
1 Year
Max Age
5 Years
Sex
MALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2017-01-31
Primary Completion
2017-04-30
Completion
2017-04-30

Countries

  • Belgium

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03046290 on ClinicalTrials.gov