Anterior Versus Posterior Laparoscopic Mesh Rectopexy For Rectal Prolapse; a Randomized Controlled Trial.

NCT03026738 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30

Last updated 2017-01-20

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Aim of this work is to compare results between Laparoscopic Anterior Mesh Rectopexy and Laparoscopic Posterior Mesh Rectopexy for patients with rectal prolapse by assessment of operative time, intraoperative blood loss , intraoperative organ injury, overall length of hospital stay, recurrence,and improvement of incontinence and constipation.

Conditions

  • Rectal Prolapse

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Laparoscopic anterior mesh rectopexy

fixation of the rectum anteriorly using laparosopy and polypropylene mesh

PROCEDURE

Laparoscopic posterior mesh rectopexy

fixation of the rectum posteriorly using laparosopy and polypropylene mesh

DEVICE

polypropylene mesh

A strip of polypropylene mesh will be introduced and sutured.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Assiut University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2017-01-31
Primary Completion
2018-12-31
Completion
2019-12-31
FDA Device
Yes

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03026738 on ClinicalTrials.gov