Clinical Evidence of Robot Guided vs. Navigated vs. Free Hand Lumbar Spinal Fusion
NCT02998060 · Status: WITHDRAWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL
Last updated 2018-10-22
Summary
Computer-based navigation systems were first introduced to spine surgery in 1995 and while they have been long established as standards in certain cranial procedures, they have not been similarly adopted in spine surgery. Designed to overcome some of the limitations of navigation-based technologies, robot-guided surgical systems have become commercially available to surgeons worldwide.These systems are rapidly challenging the gold standards.
The aim is to conduct a prospective randomized controlled trial. The randomized variable will be the screw placement technique used. One arm will be treated with lumbar fusion using robotic guidance (RG), one arm will receive the same procedure but with a free hand technique (FH) and the third arm will use navigation (NV) (CT or Fluoroscopy-assisted). Intraoperative screw revisions and revision surgery for screw malposition as well as clinical patient-reported outcomes to identify any such differences between these methods of screw insertion will be assessed.
Conditions
- Spondylolisthesis
- Intervertebral Disc Degeneration
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Pedicle Screw Placement
As a part of the lumbar spinal fusion procedure, posterior pedicle screws will be placed.
- DEVICE
-
SpineAssist®/Renaissance® (Mazor Robotics Ltd. Caesarea, Israel)
This robot will be used to guide pedicle screws into their trajectories.
- DEVICE
-
3D C-Arm (Ziehm Imaging, Nuremberg, Germany)
This 3D Fluoroscope will be used to navigate pedicle screws into their trajectories.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Marc Schröder
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Victor E Staartjes, Stud. Med. · University of Zurich
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 17 Years
- Max Age
- 79 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2019-01-01
- Primary Completion
- 2019-03-31
- Completion
- 2019-05-31
Countries
- Germany
- Switzerland
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Robotic Assisted Vertebral Body Augmentation - a Radiation Reduction Tool
NCT01269359 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Midline Lumbar Fusion Versus Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
NCT02290314 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
New Robotic Assistance System for Spinal Fusion Surgery
NCT02558621 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Research on Key Technology Development and Clinical Application of Small Interactive Spinal Endoscopic Surgery Robot
NCT06480214 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Evaluation of the Prosthetic Disc Replacement
NCT00640029 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Analysis of Pedicle Screw Accuracy to Plan Using Medtronic Mazor Robotic System
NCT05884593 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Interbody Spacers With map3® Cellular Allogeneic Bone Graft in Anterior or Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
NCT02628210 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Hybrid Systems in Comparison to the Rigid Spondylodesis in Lumbar-spine Fusion
NCT01852526 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Robot-Assisted US-Based Vertebral Segmentation for Pedicle Screw Trajectory Identification
NCT05904418 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Robotic-Guided Registry of Spine Surgery
NCT05181098 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Pedicle Screw Malposition in Spine Arthrodesis Surgeries With O-ARM-guided Navigation
NCT06020417 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Software-assisted Implantation of Elastic Spine Pad (TM) With Respect to Postoperative Change in Neck Disability Index (NDI) With the Conventional Disc Prosthesis Rotaio (TM) After Anterior Cervical Discectomy for Cervical Disc Prolapse
NCT02936739 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Study Comparing Arthrodesis Technique of Thoracic and/or Lumbar Spine by Posterior Approach Performed by Robot-assisted Surgery (Robot Mazor X Stealth ™) Versus Conventional Surgery
NCT05553028 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Advanced SPinal Innovations With Robotics and Enabling Technology Registry
NCT05071144 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Safety and Effectiveness Evaluation of Spinal Laminectomy Robot
NCT06593574 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Clinical Study of the GO-LIF® Approach for Lumbar Spinal Fixation
NCT00810433 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Retrospective/Prospective Data Collection on the LDR ROIA Interbody Fusion Device With VerteBRIDGE Plating
NCT02104141 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Standard Fusion With "Topping Off"-System in Lumbar Spine
NCT01224379 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Minimal Invasive TLIF Arthrodesis Using Augmented Reality Navigation for Percutaneous Pedicle Aiming
NCT05077410 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Prospective Study of Fusion Rates Using Spira-C Device for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery
NCT03786432 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Positioning in Lumbar Fusion Surgery and Its Impact on Spinal Sagittal Balance and Surgeon Satisfaction
NCT01326091 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Safety and Preliminary Effectiveness of NVD-001 for the Treatment of Low Grade Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
NCT03100032 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Safety of MRI Compatible Hardware for MRI-based Image Guidance During Spine Surgery
NCT04563806 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Multicenter Study of the Avenue L Interbody Spinal Fusion System Using VerteBRIDGE Plating and Posterior Fixation
NCT02068768 ·Status: TERMINATED
-
Instr. vs. Non-instr. Posterolateral Spinal Fusion in Patients With Spinal Stenosis and Degenerative Listhesis
NCT04166981 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA