MedTrace Logo

Comparison of Detection and Miss Rates of Blue Laser Imaging Versus Conventional White Light Colonoscopy

NCT02982447 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 420

Last updated 2016-12-05

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

It is a randomized controlled trial with tandem colonoscopy.Participants were randomized for use of either blue laser imaging or conventional White Light Colonoscopy on withdrawal method.comparison of detection and miss rates of BLI group Versus conventional White Light Colonoscopy.

Conditions

  • Colorectal Adenoma

Interventions

DEVICE

blue laser imaging colonoscopy

Insertion to cecum was performed under white light(WL) and once the cecum was reached, the Blue Laser Imaging mode was switched on during withdrawal of endoscope for complete colonic examination. Second colonoscopic examination was performed in a similar manner after the first complete withdrawal of the colonoscope. WL was used on insertion and WL was used on withdrawal

DEVICE

conventional white light colonoscopy

In this arm, WL was used for both insertion and withdrawal of the colonoscope during the first-pass and second-pass examinations.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Yangzhou No.1 People's Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • zhi jie hua, postgraduate · First People's Hospital of Yangzhou

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Model
SINGLE_GROUP

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
75 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-12-31
Primary Completion
2017-04-30
Completion
2017-05-31

Countries

  • China

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02982447 on ClinicalTrials.gov