MedTrace Logo

Non-invasive Ventilation Versus Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema

NCT02977572 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 114

Last updated 2017-07-21

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

The aim of the present study was to demonstrate that an Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV) performs better than a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) in the management of Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema (CPE) within an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) setting.

Conditions

  • Cardiogenic Pulmonary Oedema

Interventions

DEVICE

Non-Invasive Ventilation

In arm description

DEVICE

Continuous Positive AirwayPressure CPAP

In arm description

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Hospital General Universitario de Castellón

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • ALBERTO BELENGUER-MUNCHARAZ, MD · INTENSIVE CARE UNIT. HOSPITAL GENERAL CASTELLO

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2007-07-31
Primary Completion
2010-12-31
Completion
2011-01-31

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02977572 on ClinicalTrials.gov