MedTrace Logo

Use of Different Diagnostic Coronary Catheters Over the Radial Access - the UDDC - Radial Trial

NCT02947542 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 300

Last updated 2017-05-16

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

There is no evidence from prospective randomized clinical trials regarding the performance of conventional (two-catheter-concept; TCC) versus one-catheter-concepts (OCC) for invasive coronary angiography over the radial access.

The aim of the present trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different one-catheter concepts by use of the BLK and Tiger catheter compared to a TCC using standard Judkins catheters in diagnostic coronary angiography via transradial access. Patients with stable angina pectoris will be randomly assigned to coronary angiography performed with the BLK or Tiger (OCC) or Judkins catheters (TCC). The primary endpoint is coronary angiography duration.

Conditions

  • Stable Coronary Heart Disease

Interventions

DEVICE

One-catheter concept

Coronary angiography will be performed using the one-catheter concept.

DEVICE

Standard catheter

Coronary angiography will be performed using a standard catheter.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Charite University, Berlin, Germany

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • David M Leistner, PD · Department of Cardiology, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
95 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-04-30
Primary Completion
2016-11-30
Completion
2016-12-31

Countries

  • Germany

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02947542 on ClinicalTrials.gov