Human Amniotic Versus Synthetic Membrane as a Transient Skin Cover for Pediatric Burns
NCT02904941 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60
Last updated 2020-11-05
Summary
This is a randomised trial that aims to evaluate whether a transient skin cover made out of human amniotic membranes is effective in managing burns among pediatric patients. The primary outcome of this trial is the proportion of skin grafted amongst participants. Secondary outcomes include hospital stay and the number of surgical debridements required by included patients.
Conditions
- Burns
Interventions
- BIOLOGICAL
-
Amniotic Membrane Dressing
Amniotic membrane dressings will be made out of donated amniotic membranes from elective cesarean sections. Screening for relevant infectious diseases and irradiation will be performed from every included sample in order to minimise infectious risks. Dressings will be provided to attending surgeons during wound care at the operating theatre and removed every 72-96 hours.
- DEVICE
-
Synthetic Dressing
Silicone dressings will used as an active comparator in this study. As with the amniotic membrane, dressings will be applied to wound care at the operating room and replaced every 72 to 96 hours.
- PROCEDURE
-
Standard Wound Care
Every included participant will receive standard wound care regardless of treatment allocation. Contaminants such as clothes or other materials will be removed, and all burns will be cleaned using sterile saline solutions. Clorhexidine will also be used to clean the skin. Surgical debridement under general anesthesia or procedural sedation/analgesia will be performed to every included participant, in which nonviable tissues and blisters will be removed.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
National Fund for Research and Development in Health, Chile
collaborator OTHER -
Hospital Carlos Van Buren
collaborator OTHER -
Universidad de Valparaiso
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
[email protected] Montedonico, M.D. · Servicio de Cirugía Pediátrica, Hospital Carlos Van Buren, Valparaíso, Chile
-
Sebastián San Martín, Ph.D. · Escuela de Medicina, Universidad de Valparaíso, Chile
-
Felipe Martínez, M.D. · Escuela de Medicina, Universidad de Valparaíso, Chile
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Max Age
- 15 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2016-09-30
- Primary Completion
- 2022-12-31
- Completion
- 2022-12-31
Countries
- Chile
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Uses of Irradiated Human Amniotic Membrane in the Treatment of Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa Patients
NCT03942250 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Use of the Amniotic Membrane in Large Wound Epithelialization
NCT01824381 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Amnion Wound Covering for Enhanced Wound Healing
NCT03754218 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
A Randomized Trial Evaluating EARLY Application of a Surfactant Dressing in Thermal Injury (EARLY)
NCT04880655 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Mepilex Ag Versus Silver Sulfadiazine in Children and Adults With Burn Injuries.
NCT01439074 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Antimicrobial Soft Silicone, Silver Containing, Foam Dressing, Mepilex Border Ag, in Second Degree Burns
NCT01418482 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Dehydrated Human Amnion Chorion Membrane (dHACM) vs. Control in the Treatment of Partial Thickness Burns.
NCT02765737 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
SSD vs Collagenase in Pediatric Burn Patients
NCT00787592 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Compare the Efficacy of Mepilex and Keramatrix in Second Degree Burn Wounds
NCT01790763 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
A Comparative Study of the Healing of Chronic Ulcers of Recessive Epidermolysis Bullosa : Dressing vs Amniotic Membrane
NCT02286427 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) in Reconstructive Surgery on Children With Retractable Burn Sequelae on Extremities
NCT00858442 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Study of Silicone Material Inserts To Treat Burn Scars
NCT03159182 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing How Burn Wounds and Scars Heal in Children Using Chitosan and Silver Dressings
NCT06987981 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Randomized Control Trial for Preventative Scar Management
NCT01602458 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Mepilex Ag vs. Xeroform in Pediatric Patients That Sustain Partial Thickness Burn Injury
NCT04149808 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Wound Healing and Pain Management in Partial Thickness Burns
NCT01289340 ·Status: WITHDRAWN
-
Trial To Assess Efficacy Of A Chimeric Skin In Patients With Epidermolysys Bullosa
NCT00987142 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of PermeaDerm® (PD) as Compared to Mepilex Ag®
NCT05084183 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Volume Kinetics for Hyperoncotic Albumin in Burn Patients as Well as for Healthy Subjects
NCT02952378 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Study With an Autologous Dermo-epidermal Skin Substitute for the Treatment of Burns in Children
NCT03229564 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Permeaderm Versus Homograft for Full-thickness Burns
NCT04673435 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Research on the Key Technology of Burn Wound Treatment
NCT03279549 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of AWBAT™-D and MEPILEX® AG for Treatment of Donor Sites in Burn Surgery
NCT00974597 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
New Treatment for Donor Sites
NCT00591916 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Evaluating the Cost-effectiveness, Efficacy, Safety and Tolerance of Mepilex® Ag Versus Silvadene®
NCT00742183 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA