MedTrace Logo

Prevena™ Incision Management System vs Conventional Management for Wound Healing

NCT02892435 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: PHASE2 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 120

Last updated 2016-09-08

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Comparison in abdominal wound healing after contaminated or dirty surgery with incisional negative pressure wound therapy versus standard dressing.

Conditions

  • Wound Healing
  • Prevena
  • Dirty Abdominal Surgery
  • Contaminated Abdominal Surgery
  • Emergency Abdominal Surgery
  • Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy

Interventions

DEVICE

incisional negative pressure wound therapy

positioning incisional negative pressure therapy over closed wound.

DEVICE

conventional dressing

positioning conventional dressing

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Ospedale Misericordia e Dolce

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Francesco Feroci, MD · Ospedale Santo Stefano Prato

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
90 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2014-11-30
Primary Completion
2016-12-31
Completion
2017-12-31

Countries

  • Italy

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02892435 on ClinicalTrials.gov