MedTrace Logo

Mini-hysteroscopy Versus Conventional Office Hysteroscopy in Nulliparous Patients Undergoing Office Hysteroscopy

NCT02823119 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: PHASE2 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 100

Last updated 2016-07-06

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of hysteroscope diameter on the pain experienced by nulliparous patients undergoing diagnostic office hysteroscopy.

Conditions

Interventions

DEVICE

Mini-hysteroscopy

Hysteroscopy will be performed with the use of the non-touch technique (vaginoscopic approach). The investigators will use a rigid 2.7-mm hysteroscope with a 30° forward oblique lens and an outer sheath diameter of 3.3 mm. All of the procedures will be diagnostic.

DEVICE

Conventional Office Hysteroscopy

. Hysteroscopy will be performed with the use of the non-touch technique (vaginoscopic approach). The investigators will use a rigid 2.9-mm hysteroscope with a 30° forward oblique lens and an outer sheath diameter of 5 mm. All of the procedures will be diagnostic.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Cairo University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Usama M Fouda, M.D, PhD · Cairo University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
45 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-08-31
Primary Completion
2017-06-30
Completion
2017-06-30

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02823119 on ClinicalTrials.gov