MedTrace Logo

Economic Comparison of Percutaneous (pEVAR) vs. Open Access in EVAR.

NCT02822560 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50

Last updated 2017-05-12

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The present clinical trial is performed in the field of vascular surgery. The aim of the study is the economical and clinical comparison of two different access ways to the femoral artery with intention of endovascular repair of aortic aneurysm. The usual access is a surgical cutdown to the femoral artery and is compared to a percutaneous access which is closed via a suture mediated device (Perclose ProGlide, Abbott).

Conditions

  • Aortic Aneurysm

Interventions

DEVICE

pEVAR

percutaneous femoral access using a suture-mediated closure device

PROCEDURE

open femoral access

cutdown to femoral artery and surgical closure

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Wilhelminenspital Vienna

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Afshin Assadian, PD, MD · Wilhelminenspital Vienna

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
SINGLE_GROUP

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
90 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-07-31
Primary Completion
2017-02-28
Completion
2017-02-28
FDA Device
Yes

Countries

  • Austria

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02822560 on ClinicalTrials.gov