MedTrace Logo

Air-charged vs Water-filled Catheters (Bonn)

NCT02756182 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 25

Last updated 2020-01-31

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

A comparative study was conducted and the patient underwent a conventional urodynamic study. In order to successfully determine if the Air-Charged (AC) and Water-Perfused (WP) measurements are equivalent, the two sources of intravesical pressure (Pves) and abdominal pressure (Pabd) were collected concurrently at various fill volumes for the bladder.

Conditions

  • Urodynamics

Interventions

DEVICE

TDOC air-charged catheter

Urodynamic study utilizing a single catheter technique to measure WP \& AC measurements

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Laborie Medical Technologies Inc.

    lead INDUSTRY

Study Design

Allocation
NA
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Model
SINGLE_GROUP

Eligibility

Min Age
21 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-04-27
Primary Completion
2016-08-22
Completion
2016-08-22

Countries

  • Germany

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02756182 on ClinicalTrials.gov