Ejaculatory Sparing vs. Non-ejaculatory Sparing GreenLight Laser Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate

NCT02749604 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 40

Last updated 2016-04-25

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

GreenLight laser PVP currently gains wide acceptance as a minimally invasive treatment for benign prostate enlargment and the emergence of ejaculatory sparing techniques made it feasible to get both benefits: relief of lower urinary tract symptoms and preservation of ejaculation. However evaluation of actual infravesical de-obstruction following such techniques remains a grey zone in the literature without an objective assessment of the degree of de-obstruction. Furthermore, the impact of maintaining ejaculation on different domains of the sexual function using comprehensive assessment tools was not compared in ejaculatory sparring vs. non-ejaculatory sparring approaches.

Conditions

  • Prostatic Hyperplasia

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Non-ejaculatory sparring PVP

Greenlight laser photoslective vaporization of the prostate

PROCEDURE

Ejaculatory sparring PVP

Greenlight laser photoslective vaporization of the prostate with preservation of the ejaculatory hood

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Mansoura University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Ahmed Elshal · Mansoura University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
50 Years
Sex
MALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-03-31
Primary Completion
2017-09-30
Completion
2018-03-31

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02749604 on ClinicalTrials.gov