Greenlight Vaporization vs Xpeeda Vaporesection
NCT04386941 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 97
Last updated 2025-04-10
Summary
Bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common problem, which impact patients' quality of life. It may lead to serious outcomes, including urinary tract infection, hematuria, bladder stones, urinary retention, hydronephrosis, and rarely renal insufficiency.
Introduction of the Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) represented a turning point in minimally invasive laser therapy for BPH as it achieves size-independent prostatic cavities similar to simple open prostatectomy with significantly lower perioperative morbidity.
Recently, Holmium Xpeeda side firing fibre was introduced and it stands apart from other available technologies as a combination of power and efficiency, which minimizes vaporization time. This technology seems to revolutionize utilization of the Holmium power and delivering more energy directly to the tissue, due to its capability of being in contact with the tissue.
To date, no outcomes of the new Xpeeda laser fiber have been reported in the literature, which is striving for trials comparing XPS 180W with other competitors such as Holmium vaporesection with the new fiber Xpeeda. Therefore, this study is planned to compare both procedures in improving bothersome LUTS secondary to BPH, and to evaluate safety and cost effectiveness.
Conditions
- Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
- Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Xpeeda Fibre Laser Vaporesection of the Prostate
Both interventions are currently used standard of care treatments for the Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for patients with bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Holmium Xpeeda side firing fibre was introduced and it stands apart from other available technologies as a combination of power and efficiency, which minimizes vaporization time. This technology seems to revolutionize utilization of the Holmium power and delivering more energy directly to the tissue, due to its capability of being in contact with the tissue.
- PROCEDURE
-
Greenlight XPS Vaporization of the Prostate
The introduction of the Xcelerated Performance System (XPS) 180W in 2010 with the MoXy fibers represents the highest-powered system currently in use for this type of laser.11 It encourages the adoption of the enucleation principle, making it a real contender to HoLEP in treating large adenomas. Despite the fact that large prostates often require more energy and longer operative time, the XPS system has reduced the operative time and number of fibers required in these situations.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Northern Ontario School of Medicine
collaborator OTHER -
Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre
collaborator OTHER -
Thunder Bay Regional Health Research Institute
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Hazem Elmansy, MD · Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 50 Years
- Sex
- MALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2019-07-31
- Primary Completion
- 2022-07-10
- Completion
- 2024-07-31
Countries
- Canada
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
A Long-Term Study Examining the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia With Photoselective Vaporization
NCT00465101 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
PVP Compared to TURP for the Treatment of Benign Hyperplasia of the Prostate
NCT00527371 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Holmium Laser Ablation of the Prostate (HoLAP) Versus KTP Laser Vaporization of the Prostate
NCT00169767 ·Status: TERMINATED
-
Aquablation vs. Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate in the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Medium to Large Size Prostates
NCT04560907 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Prostate Artery Embolization Compared to Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
NCT04236687 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
KTP Green Light Prostatectomy Compared With TUR-P in High Risk Patients
NCT02075736 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Trial of HoLEP vs. PVP in Treating BPH in Patients With Bleeding Tendency
NCT02293759 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
ThuLEP vs. HoLEP vs. Monopolar Enucleation in Management of BPH
NCT03230721 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Thulium Fiber Laser (TFL) vs Holmium MOSES for Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)
NCT05240001 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Green LEP vs ThuLEP in Management of Marked Enlarged Prostate
NCT03305861 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
GreenLight XPS Laser System Retrospective Chart Review
NCT02139969 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
HoLEP vs BPRP in the Management of a Large Volume (> 80 gm) Symptomatic BPH
NCT04935151 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluating the Clinical Efficacy of Thulio vs. Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate
NCT07187180 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
GreenLight Laser Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate vs Bipolar Transurethral Vaporization of the Prostate; RCT
NCT02283684 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
MRI Guided Transrectal Prostate Laser Ablation for Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy (BPH)
NCT03131544 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
HoLEP (50W) vs. HoLEP (100W) for Treatment of BPH
NCT02737241 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
HoLEP in Management of BPH Patients With Predominant Voiding vs Storage LUTS: A Comparative Retrospective Study
NCT04178811 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
HoLEP Vs BPEP for Large Prostatic Adenoma
NCT04275076 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
HoLEP vs BPRP of a Large Volume BPH: a Randomised Controlled Trial
NCT04143399 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Phase 4 Study of Greenlight XPS Laser Versus BiVAP Saline Vaporization of the Prostate in Men With Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
NCT01500057 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Slim Sheath 22F Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) vs 26 F Sheath HoLEP for BPH: RCT
NCT06546865 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Outcomes and Complications of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate in Expert Hands
NCT03583034 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
HoLEP vs BipolEP in Management of BPH Patients With Large Prostates
NCT06759194 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study Between Safety and Effectiveness of High Versus Low Power HOLEP
NCT05678452 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Thulium Fiber Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (TFLEP) vs HoLEP With Moses Technology (m-HoLEP)
NCT04807296 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA