MedTrace Logo

Study Comparing Outcomes Between Conventional IVF and a "Freeze-all"-Strategy in Assisted Reproductive Technology

NCT02746562 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 424

Last updated 2019-04-02

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare conventional fresh embryo transfer with a "freeze all and transfer later strategy" in assisted reproductive technology in terms of ongoing pregnancy rates, live birth rates as well as perinatal outcomes.

Conditions

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Freeze all

Freezing of all blastocyst stage embryos with thawing and transfer in a subsequent natural cycle

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Rigshospitalet, Denmark

    collaborator OTHER

  • Herlev Hospital

    collaborator OTHER

  • Holbaek Sygehus

    collaborator OTHER

  • Skane University Hospital

    collaborator OTHER

  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital

    collaborator OTHER

  • Regional Hospital Skive

    collaborator UNKNOWN

  • Dexeus University Hospital Barcelona

    collaborator UNKNOWN

  • Anja Bisgaard Pinborg

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Anja Bisgaard Pinborg, MD, DMSc · Fertility Clinic, Obstetrical and Gynecological department, Hvidovre Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
39 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-05-31
Primary Completion
2019-01-31
Completion
2019-09-30

Countries

  • Denmark

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02746562 on ClinicalTrials.gov