Follicular Steroid Genesis in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation

NCT02738580 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 112

Last updated 2020-03-03

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

Serum concentrations of the different hormones involved in follicular steroid genesis during a cycle of controlled ovarian stimulation with recombinant FSH or HMG will be compared in this study. Serum Progesterone (P) levels at the end of Controlled Ovarian Stimulation (i.e. the day of triggering) have been related to cycle outcome, in terms of ongoing pregnancy and live birth rates. Large cohort studies show that P levels above a certain threshold are associated with poorer cycle outcome. The mechanisms behind P elevation are not well understood yet. It has been shown that P levels are positively related to ovarian response and to the dose of FSH given during COS. Furthermore, it has been well documented that P levels at the end of stimulation are significantly higher when recombinant (r) FSH is used for COS when compared to HMG, either in a GnRH agonist long protocol or in a GnRH antagonist protocol. Some authors suggest that this finding is explained by the fact that COS with rFSH provides a higher oocyte yield than when hMG is given, so the higher P levels observed would be explained by the larger number of follicles developed when rFSH is used. On the other hand, other authors explain this event by a different follicular esteroidogenesis when HMG is used for COS compared to rFSH The hypotheisis behind this assumption is that rFSH enhances P synthesis from its precursor pregnenolone in the granulosa cells. This P is unable to be further metabolized into androgens because of the lack of 17-20 lyase in the human granulosa cells, and therefore is delivered into circulation. On the other hand, when HMG is given for COS, the ∆4 pathway is promoted, and pregnenolone will be catabolized in to Dehidroepiandrostenodione (DHEA), in the theca cells, and this one to Androstenodione, which will be finally aromatized in to estrogens. This mechanism will explain the lower P and higher E2 levels observed in HMG cycles in comparison to rFSH cycles.

Conditions

Interventions

DRUG

COS with GnRH antagonists and rFSH

Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with GnRH antagonists and rFSH in women with normal ovarian function.

DRUG

COS with GnRH antagonists and HP-HMG

Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with GnRH antagonists and HP-HMG in women with normal ovarian function.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Roche Pharma AG

    collaborator INDUSTRY
  • Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad, IVI VALENCIA

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Ernesto Bosch, MDPhD · IVI VALENCIA

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
35 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-10-18
Primary Completion
2018-06-15
Completion
2018-06-15

Countries

  • Spain

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02738580 on ClinicalTrials.gov