Surgical Treatment of Spinal Deformity With Sagittal Imbalance Using Patient-specific Rods: A Multicenter, Controlled, Double- Blind Randomized Trial: The PROFILE Study
NCT02730507 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 73
Last updated 2022-05-05
Summary
Lumbar degenerative diseases (LDD) are an increasingly common condition affecting millions of patients worldwide. LDD can impact not only function, but can also become markedly disabling and cause severe chronic pain. Recent studies support the idea that analysis of sagittal balance is a crucial keypoint to optimize the management of lumbar degenerative diseases, especially when spinal instrumentation is intended.
The first treatment of these pathologies is a medical treatment (medications, physical therapy and exercise). Surgical treatment is frequently necessary if the symptoms worsen and is generally a posterior spinal fusion with instrumentation (screws, hooks and rods) and bone graft. Basic principle of the surgery is to realign the spine along the rod.
Despite documented techniques for surgical planning, it appears that a significant number of patients are ultimately under-corrected after surgery Realignment failure has not only been associated with poor functional outcome but also major complications, such as pseudoarthrosis and rod breakage, which often results in additional surgical procedures.
From a pragmatic point of view, there are two main reasons for realignment failure: poor surgical planning and poor execution. One of the assumptions is that perioperative manual bending of the rod may not always allow the surgeon to restore the sagittal parameters as intended.
A new concept of patient-specific rod (PSR) is now being proposed by a French manufacturer in order to enable an optimal correction and surgical stabilization of the spine. PSR are designed to fit with the patient's unique sagittal spine profile and with surgeons' surgical planning. However, no relevant clinical data is currently available to support the expected medical benefit of this new technology.
The objective of the study is therefore to carry out a study hypothesizing that the use of PSR could improve the percentage of patients whose sagittal profile is optimally corrected after spinal surgery, as well as the patient's quality of life.
Conditions
- Spinal Deformity With Sagittal Imbalance
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Surgery with patient-specific rod
Bras A: PSRs must be used with the appropriate instrumentation designed by the same manufacturer. In order to minimize potential bias derived from using different spinal systems or reduction techniques, the posterior instrumentation must be the same (except the use of standard straight rod) in both groups. The surgical method to implement the PSR will be the same as the one to implement the conventional rod. Except for the bending procedure (patient specific rod or conventional rod with perioperative manual bending), the characteristics of implantable devices (biomaterial and diameter of the rod, design, type of screw, etc.) will be the same in each center.
- DEVICE
-
Conventional straight rod
Bras B: The control group is composed of patients operated with standard straight rods, which are bent in the operating room by the surgeon. In order to minimize potential bias derived from using different spinal systems or reduction techniques, the posterior instrumentation used in the control group must be the same (except the use of PSRs) than the experimental group.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Hospices Civils de Lyon
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Cedric BARREY, PHD · Hospices Civils de Lyon
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2016-10-31
- Primary Completion
- 2021-02-01
- Completion
- 2022-03-01
More Related Trials
-
Balance Amongst Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT06075862 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Sagittal Imbalance and Lumbar Stenosis Surgery: Decompression Without Implant
NCT03065452 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Clinical Study on the Therapeutic Efficacy of Biportal Endoscopic Decompression Spine Surgery and Lumbar Decompression Fusion Surgery in the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
NCT07289737 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Correlation Between Sagittal Balance of the Spine and Psychopathological Profile
NCT02166775 ·Status: TERMINATED
-
"Is Instrumentation Necessary for "Static" Degenerative Spondylolisthesis"
NCT02530775 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Efficiency of Surgical Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT03365401 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Study to Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness of Dynamic Stabilization Versus Lumbar Fusion in Treatment of Multilevel Lumbar Disc Degeneration Disease
NCT02385695 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Interbody vs Instrumented Posterolateral Fusion Following Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
NCT01921530 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Efficacy and Safety of K-rod Dynamic Stabilization System in the Repair of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases
NCT03214042 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Does Improvement Towards a Normal Cervical Sagittal Configuration Aid in the Management of Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
NCT05553002 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Neurosurgery Patient Outcomes in Treating Spinal Disorders
NCT01220921 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Lumbar Stabilization Exercises in Adult Patients With Lumbar Arthrodesis Surgery
NCT03538093 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Restoring Segmental Lumbar Lordosis After Failed Previous Fusion at the Same Level
NCT07050290 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Corrections of Anterior Imbalances by Posterior Instrumentation and Osteotomies
NCT05100732 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
The Rehabilitation Outcome of Patients With Lumbar Spondylolisthesis. A Prospective Randomized Study
NCT02435485 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Unilateral Versus Bilateral TLIF for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
NCT03856554 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Indirect vs. Direct Decompression for Treatment of Central Stenosis: RCT
NCT04708977 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Minuteman Spinal Fusion Implant Versus Surgical Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT01455805 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Lordosis on Clinical Outcome After Spinal Fusion for One-level Degenerative Spondylolysthesis
NCT04174144 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Risk Factors for Proximal Junctional Kyphosis Assessment After Spinal Instrumentation
NCT02881580 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Long Term Outcomes of Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injections for Spinal Stenosis
NCT02260401 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Midline Lumbar Fusion Versus Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
NCT02290314 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Percutaneous Diskectomy SpineJet x Open Microdiskectomy in Treatment of Lumbar Radiculopathy
NCT01367860 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
3rd-year Post-surgical Evaluation of Adjacent Segment Disc Degeneration Onset in Lumbar Spine (Spinal Fusion vs. Lumbar Arthroplasty With Disc Replacement)
NCT05561322 ·Status: WITHDRAWN
-
Study Comparing Postoperative Treatment After Surgical Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
NCT05312281 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA