A Study of Dorsal Versus Ventral Buccal Mucosa Graft Onlay for Bulbar Urethroplasty
NCT02634619 · Status: TERMINATED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 95
Last updated 2019-04-25
Summary
The investigators propose a randomized non-blinded comparison of dorsal vs. ventral approach for buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty in the bulbar urethra. Buccal mucosa graft is a common method of repairing the strictured urethra. Current evidence suggests the two approaches for placement of the graft are equally successful at correcting the stricture and the two approaches have similar risks of complications. The investigators propose to randomly assign appropriately selected patients to either a dorsally- or ventrally-placed graft. No additional procedures beyond normal care protocol will be required of the patients. Success will be assessed via objective and subjective methods; complications will be tallied in a standardized fashion. Outcomes will be measured at two years.
Conditions
- Urethral Stricture
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Ventral buccal mucosa onlay urethroplasty
Ventral buccal graft onlay involves a midline perineal incision and retraction of the bulbospongiosum muscle downward to expose the ventral urethral surface. The corpus spongiosum is incised longitudinally to expose the urethral lumen and the incision is extended proximal and distal to the established stricture. The buccal mucosa graft is harvested and trimmed to the length and width of the urethrotomy and the graft is sutured at the proximal and distal apices and a running suture at the lateral margins to establish a tight anastomosis. Ventral placement allows for limited urethral mobilization and easy access, but there is concern about higher likelihood of diverticulum formation and development of other associated complications - such as post void dribbling and ejaculatory dysfunction.
- PROCEDURE
-
Dorsal buccal mucosa onlay urethroplasty
Dorsal buccal onlay also involves a midline perineal incision. The bulbo-cavernosum and corpora cavernosum are dissected from the bulbar urethra allowing for complete mobilization of the urethra. The urethra is rotated 180 degrees to allow for dorsal access and an incision is made on the dorsal urethra proximal and distal to the stricture location. The buccal graft is harvested and trimmed to the appropriate size of the urethrotomy and spread on the overlying tunica albuginea of the corporal bodies. The urethra is rotated back to allow for suturing of the left mucosal margin to the left margin of the buccal graft and corporal bodies, essentially covering the entire urethral plate. Dorsal placement has potential for a more stable vascular bed for graft sustainability and less spongiosal bleeding, but requires a greater urethral mobilization and longer operative times.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- collaborator OTHER
-
Baylor College of Medicine
collaborator OTHER -
University of Iowa
collaborator OTHER -
University of Kansas
collaborator OTHER -
Central Ohio Urology Group
collaborator OTHER -
Loyola University Chicago
collaborator OTHER -
Lahey Clinic
collaborator OTHER - collaborator OTHER
-
New York University
collaborator OTHER -
University of California, San Diego
collaborator OTHER - collaborator OTHER
-
University of California, San Francisco
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
benjamin n breyer, MD, MAS, FAC · University of California, San Francisco
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- MALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2016-06-30
- Primary Completion
- 2018-11-30
- Completion
- 2018-11-30
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Laser Visual Internal Urethrotomy With Versus Without Paclitaxel Injection
NCT06123520 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Impact of Urinary Catheter Fixation on Meatal Pressure Injury in Male Patients in the Intensive Care Unit
NCT06967116 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Connected Catheter- Safety and Effectiveness Study
NCT03843073 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Functional Outcome of Urethral Reconstructive Surgery
NCT01982136 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Transobturator Urethral Sling Placement With an Autologous Rectus Facia
NCT03949348 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Connected Catheter Clinical Feasibility Study( CFS)
NCT03405285 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness and Safety of Cell-Assisted Lipotransfer for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence
NCT01850342 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Connected Catheter - Safety and Effectiveness Study
NCT04059159 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence by Injection of Autologous Muscle Fibers Into the Urethral Sphincter.
NCT01323426 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Cross-linked Hyaluronic Acid/dextranomer for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence
NCT06606613 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Indwelling Urinary Catheterization Versus Clean Intermittent Catheterization for the Short-term Management of Hospitalized Patients With Transient Acute Urinary Retention
NCT02942641 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
9000 URETHRA STUDY: a Study About Urethroplasty for Urethral Stricture Disease
NCT04071925 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Somato-sensory Reflex Arch in Spinal Cord Injury - Effect on Colorectal Transport
NCT01274312 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Connected Catheter (C2P) Study for Bladder Management
NCT03626324 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Outcome of Pre-transplant Bladder Cycling in Patients With Defunctionalized Bladder
NCT06787092 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Safety and Clinical Performance of the Connected Catheter Study
NCT05330598 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Urodynamics: Prone Vs. Seated Position
NCT06864117 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Urethral Catheter Immobilization Device to Reduce Catheter-Related Discomfort
NCT03341468 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Direct Full-stage Implantation of Sacral Neuromodulation
NCT03697954 ·Status: WITHDRAWN
-
Use of The Spanner Temporary Prostatic Stent as an Alternative to a Urinary Catheter to Achieve Bladder Drainage in Men
NCT02643849 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Intermittent Urinary Catheters
NCT01284361 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Treating Stress Urinary Incontinence: Laparoscopic Obturator Urethropexy vs Burch Urethropexy
NCT04133935 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Autologous Cell Therapy for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Males Following Prostate Surgery
NCT02291432 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Comparison of Burch Urethropexy and Mid-urethral Sling Performed Concomitantly With a Sacral Colpopexy
NCT00934999 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Sacral Nerve Stimulation to Treat Urgency Urinary Incontinence With Wireless Neuromodulation
NCT02434874 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA