Evaluation of Spinal Mobility Reeducation in Patients Treated for a Lumbar Spinal Stenosis After Epidural Infiltration
NCT02610335 · Status: TERMINATED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 23
Last updated 2020-10-26
Summary
In actual practice the patients with mild or moderate lumbar spinal stenosis symptoms receive an epidural infiltration and participate in kyphosis reeducation in first intention. Yet the kyphosis reeducation did not show a real profit in the time compared with the natural evolution of the pathology. The study assume that the spinal mobility reeducation will reduce the incidence of pain recurrences compared with the classic kyphosis reeducation.
Conditions
- Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Control group (C)
* kyphosis reeducation on Huber platform during 2 weeks, * patient education : on physiopathology of the lumbar spinal stenosis and treatments as well as healthy lifestyle and prevention (plans of anatomy, plastic column, slides of medical imaging), * flexibility exercises, stretching exercises and abdominal muscles exercises : to continue at home (the exercises will be reported on a book that will be given to the patient), * exercises on cycle ergometer or walking on treadmill : to continue at home.
- OTHER
-
Test group
* spinal mobility reeducation on Huber platform during 2 weeks, * patient education : on physiopathology of the lumbar spinal stenosis and treatments as well as healthy lifestyle and prevention (plans of anatomy, plastic column, slides of medical imaging), * flexibility exercises and mobilization exercises : to continue at home (the exercises will be reported on a book that will be given to the patient), * exercises on cycle ergometer or walking on treadmill : to continue at home.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University Hospital, Bordeaux
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Mathieu DE-SÈZE, MD · service de médecine physique et de réadaptation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux,
-
Antoine BENARD, MD · USMR CHU Bordeaux
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE_CARE
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 50 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2016-01-15
- Primary Completion
- 2018-06-01
- Completion
- 2018-06-01
Countries
- France
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Study Comparing Postoperative Treatment After Surgical Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
NCT05312281 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Optimizing Impact of Manual Therapy on Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT06023498 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Instability in the Lumbar Spine of Patients With Age Related Changes and Narrowing of the Spinal Canal (Spinal Stenosis)
NCT04406987 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Barriers and Facilitators to Cycling for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT03325309 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparative Effectiveness and Prognostic Factors of Surgical and Non-surgical Management of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT03548441 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Study on the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spine Stenosis With a Percutaneous Interspinous Implant
NCT01057641 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Vertebral Osteosynthesis in Degenerative Lumbar Stenosis With Spondylolisthesis
NCT00252551 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Decompression vs Physical Training for the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT03495661 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Decompression vs. Fusion for Stable Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
NCT02348645 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ambulatory Geriatric Endoscopic Spine
NCT06523426 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Indirect vs. Direct Decompression for Treatment of Central Stenosis: RCT
NCT04708977 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Interbody vs Instrumented Posterolateral Fusion Following Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
NCT01921530 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Screening for Kyphosis in the Mean Term in Patients Treated With Kyphoplasty Alone in the Management of Stable Traumatic Compression Fractures of the Thoracolumbar Spine
NCT02085811 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Effectiveness of Prehabilitation for Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Surgery
NCT03388983 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Decompression Versus Instrumented Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Disease. Clinical and Biomechanical Outcome Study
NCT06335511 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
PRE Surgery reHABilitation for Spinal Stenosis
NCT04330885 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Activity Levels Amongst Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT06057428 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Epidural Steroid Injection Versus Epidural Steroid Injection and Manual Physical Therapy and Exercise in the Management of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT00786981 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness and Safety of Pharmacopuncture Therapy for Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT05242497 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Is it Really Necessary Going All Over the Top in Patients With Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis?
NCT07026305 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Effectiveness of Microdecompression and Laminectomy for Central Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT02006901 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison Between The Results of Open and Microsurgical Decompression in Degenerative Spinal Canal Stenosis in Lumbar Spine
NCT06722859 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Instr. vs. Non-instr. Posterolateral Spinal Fusion in Patients With Spinal Stenosis and Degenerative Listhesis
NCT04166981 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Bilateral Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT01995461 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Endoscopic Decompression Versus Microscopic Decompression in Lumbar Canal Stenosis
NCT06381167 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA