2%-Mepivacaine With Two Different Vasoconstrictors Solutions in Third Molar Surgery a Comparative Study
NCT02603198 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30
Last updated 2016-05-11
Summary
Dental treatments, particularly third molars extraction, can become extremely uncomfortable and painful. They are associated to anxiety, fear and many other unpleasant sensations. During surgery, patients can present cardiorespiratory repercussions of these sensations. This fact generally justifies the employment of methods of monitoring and appliance of safer therapeutic alternatives. Local anesthetics are the most frequently drugs used in dentistry. Vasoconstrictors, particularly epinephrine, are important components of anesthetic solutions to increased time for anesthetic absorption and consequently increasing the duration of anesthesia. The use of smaller amounts of anesthetic solution can reduce the risk of systemic toxicity, however decrease the total surgical time. It is well known that the amount of epinephrine injected into patients during anesthetic procedures can produce adverse hemodynamic effects. Levonordefrin was adding to dental cartridges promising to reduce cardiac stimulation due it less β activity, and maintain the same clinical and systemic effects. But some studies for maxillary or intraosseous infiltrations showed no difference in heart rate and any anesthetic success over epinephrine. Thus, this study aims to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of anesthetic mepivacaine 2% with epinephrine 1:100,000 or 1:20,000 levonordefrin employing a clinical trial model of third molars extractions in healthy adults.
Conditions
Interventions
- DRUG
-
mepivacaine chloridrato epinephrine
local anesthesia for tooth removal
- DRUG
-
mepivacaine chloridrato levonordefrin
local anesthesia for tooth removal
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University of Sao Paulo
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Marcelo Minharro Cechetti, PhD · Post - Doctorate
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 40 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2014-08-31
- Primary Completion
- 2015-06-30
- Completion
- 2016-07-31
Countries
- Brazil
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Lower Third Molar Removal With 2% and 4% Articaine
NCT02457325 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Bupivacaine Supplementation For Postoperative Pain Control In Surgical Removal Of Mandibular Third Molars
NCT02353676 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Jaw Muscle Pain Post Wisdom Molar Surgery
NCT07094542 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Efficacy of Differents Anaesthetics in Mandibular Third Molar Germectomy
NCT04465149 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Self-Reported Pain in Children Submitted to Single Infiltration of Articaine During Primary Molar Extraction
NCT05443009 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Anesthetic Efficacy Of 4% ArtpharmaDent Versus 2% Mepecaine-L in Extraction of Lower First Primary Molars
NCT03942991 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Anxiety and Hemodynamic Changes in Third Molar Extraction After Patient Education
NCT07018115 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Articaine 4% Versus Mepivacaine 2% for Surgery of Molars Thirds: Clinical Trial.
NCT03384160 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Distolingual Infiltration Verses Conventional Nerve Block in Mandibular Third Molar Extraction
NCT07296926 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Two Homologous Active Principles for Local Dental Anesthesia
NCT04166890 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Articaine Infiltration in Anesthetizing Mandibular Second Primary Molars
NCT06201949 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Remimazolam vs Midazolam Cognitive and Motor Recovery After Intravenous Conscious Sedation for Dental Extractions.
NCT05220462 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Evaluation of Two Pharmacological Protocols for Pre-emptive Analgesia in Impacted Third Molar Surgery
NCT02665533 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Bupivacaine in the Treatment of Postoperative Pain of Impacted Third Molar Extraction
NCT03950700 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Topical Hydrocortisone for Pain and Edema Control After Third Molar Surgery
NCT03179813 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
The Use of Injectable-Platelet Rich Fibrin (i-PRF) in the Lower Third Molar Extraction
NCT06073535 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
92/5000 Preoperative Efficacy of Traumeel Versus Dexamethasone in the Control of Pain, Swelling and Trismus
NCT03567369 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of EXPAREL for Prolonged Postsurgical Analgesia in Subjects Undergoing Third Molar Extraction
NCT02517905 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Comparison of the Use of Dexamethasone and Diclofenac Sodium in Immediate Post-Operative Care in Third Molar Surgery
NCT02698306 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy and Safety of Administration of Different Doses of 4% Articaine.
NCT06644950 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Articaine and Mepivacaine Without Palatal Injection in Pain Assessment During Maxillary Teeth Extraction
NCT03470532 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Effectiveness of Diclofenac and Its Association to Codeine After Lower Third Molar Extraction.
NCT02547896 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Effect of Dexamethasone and Methylprednisolone on Pain, Swelling and Trismus After Third Molar Surgery
NCT01603498 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Reducing Pain From Wisdom Molar Extractions
NCT05335070 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Comparison Between Efficiency of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block and Buccal Infiltration Techniques Using Articaine 4% 1:100000
NCT03130855 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA