Impacts of Different Training Modes (Intense Versus Ordinary) on the Immune System and Memory Functions in pwMS

NCT02571335 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 65

Last updated 2016-08-30

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a chronic immune-mediated disease of the central nervous system, accompanied by varying inflammatory manifestations, demyelinization and axonal loss. With chronic progressive or relapsing-remitting disease onsets persons with MS (pwMS) progressively develop impaired functional capacity and show reduced physical activity and cognitive decline compared to healthy controls. The primary aims of rehabilitation in pwMS are therefore to increase levels of activity and participation leading to increase independence of the participants. In general exercise ranges from passive physiotherapy-based interventions to submaximal endurance training sessions. Current recommendations advise pwMS that exercise should be matched with the individual performance capacities. Exercise training in pwMS then has the potential to target and improve many components outlined in the ICF-model.

Cytokines and neurotrophic factors have received increased attention in MS research and addressed the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) as an important mediator of neuronal regeneration linking the effects of exercise with MS pathogenesis. Data show positive connections between elevated neurotrophin concentrations, induction of neuroplasticity, recovery of the motor and cognitive functions and the applied training intensities. Similarly, intensive and progressive exercise bouts seem to have greater benefits on cardiorespiratory fitness and maximum voluntary strength in elderly and seniors with dementia. Therefore, specific exercise prescriptions may be necessary for targeting the specific impairments also in pwMS.

This study aims to evaluate two different training modalities (intensive versus normal) in pwMS. It is expected that both modalities will improve cardiorespiratory fitness and cognitive functions in pwMS. Based on the findings that higher training intensities facilitate greater benefits, it is expected that pwMS will tolerate the intensive training intensities and show positive connections to elevated neurotrophin concentrations.

The results will to help to clearer understand the benefits of each type of exercise conveyed for pwMS and will assist in the development of patient-specific exercise prescriptions.

Conditions

Interventions

BEHAVIORAL

Intensive Training

Week 1: Ratio of continuous and interval training of 2:1. Entry point at day one with 20 min of continuous, physiologically defined heart rate controlled cycling at 50-60 rounds per minutes at 75% of HRpeak. Resistance training is performed with 70% of the subjective-felt 1-round maximum with three sets and 10-12 repetitions and three exercises for the upper and lower extremities. Week 2 Progression of endurance training: 4x5 minutes with 2 Minutes between each interval performed at 80% of HRmax Progression resistance training: 75% of the subjective-felt 1-round maximum with three sets and 8-10 repetitions and three exercises for the upper and lower extremities. Week 3 Same as week 2.

BEHAVIORAL

Normal Training

The control intervention is the normal rehabilitation program of the Valens clinic.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • German Sport University, Cologne

    collaborator OTHER
  • Klinik Valens

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Juerg Kesselring, Prof · Klinik Valens

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
75 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2015-09-30
Primary Completion
2016-08-31
Completion
2016-08-31

Countries

  • Switzerland

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02571335 on ClinicalTrials.gov