Validation of a Subjective Rating Scale for Assessment of the Surgical Workspace in Laparoscopy

NCT02545270 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 16

Last updated 2019-06-17

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

It is of great importance to obtain optimal surgical conditions for the surgeon in order to increase patient safety. The effect of different interventions on surgical conditions has been assessed by various surgeon-assessed rating scales. A 5-point surgical rating scale has previously been tested in a proof-of-concept trial - but not validated - during radical retropubic prostatectomy by asking different surgeons to evaluate the surgical workspace using video sequences.

In an ongoing study (The Hernia Study, Trial registration NCT02247466) performed by investigators group, investigators are using a 5-point scale to rate the surgical workspace during laparoscopic ventral herniotomy with or without neuromuscular blockade. This scale is based on previously used scales by already published studies and has a description connected to each point. To the authors' knowledge the scale has never been validated in a laparoscopic setting, where the intra-abdominal pressure during pneumoperitoneum can have a great influence on visualization. In fact, to investigators knowledge, no validated surgeon-assessed rating scale regarding the surgical workspace during laparoscopic surgery does exists.

Purpose:

Primary aim:

To validate a 5-point rating scale by investigating the inter-rater agreement of evaluations of the surgical workspace at different intra-abdominal pressures. Using intra-abdominal video recordings.

Secondary aims:

To validate a 10-point rating scale by investigating the inter-rater agreement of evaluations of the surgical workspace at different intra-abdominal pressures.

To test the agreement between the two rating scales. To assess which of the two rating scales has the highest inter-rater agreement To assess the intra-rater agreement of both rating scales.

Hypothesis:

Investigators hypothesize that the 5-point rating scale has an intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) \> 0.6., validated by video-sequences obtained during laparoscopic surgery.

Conditions

  • Hernia, Inguinal

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Level of pneumoperitoneum 12-9-6 mmHg

Elective laparoscopic inguinal hernia procedures will be used to make video-recordings under 3 different levels of pneumoperitoneum (12-9-6 mmHg) during desufflation.

PROCEDURE

Level of pneumoperitoneum 11-8-5 mmHg

Elective laparoscopic inguinal hernia procedures will be used to make video-recordings under 3 different levels of pneumoperitoneum (11-8-5 mmHg) during desufflation.

PROCEDURE

Level of pneumoperitoneum 10-7-4 mmHg

Elective laparoscopic inguinal hernia procedures will be used to make video-recordings under 3 different levels of pneumoperitoneum (10-7-4 mmHg) during desufflation.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Principal Investigators

  • Roar Medici, MD · Herlev Hospital University of Copenhagen

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
TRIPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-03-31
Primary Completion
2016-07-31
Completion
2016-08-31

Countries

  • Denmark

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02545270 on ClinicalTrials.gov