MedTrace Logo

Retroperitoneal Packing or Angioembolization for Hemorrhage Control of Pelvic Fractures

NCT02535624 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 56

Last updated 2017-10-30

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study is designed to answer whether minimal invasive vessel clotting (angioembolization) or open surgery (retroperitoneal packing) is more effective for pelvic fractures with massive bleeding. Patients admitted at daytime (7am-5pm) are treated with angioembolization while patients admitted at nighttime (5pm to 7am) are treated with open surgery.

Conditions

  • Shock, Hemorrhagic
  • Fractures, Bone
  • Multiple Trauma

Interventions

PROCEDURE

PACKING

By retroperitoneal access the space in front of the pelvic fracture is compressed with surgical towels, which stops effectively venous bleeding

PROCEDURE

ANGIO

Using en endovascular approach, bleeding arteries are identified and clotted using embolizing agents, or coils.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Shandong Provincial Hospital

    collaborator OTHER_GOV

  • Uppsala University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Dongsheng Zhou, MD, PhD · Shandong Provincial Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
65 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2003-02-28
Primary Completion
2013-02-28
Completion
2013-02-28

Countries

  • China

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02535624 on ClinicalTrials.gov