Outcome of Different Ablation Strategies In Persistent and Long-Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

NCT02533843 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 120

Last updated 2018-04-25

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Specific Aim: This prospective randomized study aims to compare the impact of three different catheter ablation approaches on long-term procedure outcome in terms of arrhythmia recurrence in persistent (PeAF) and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (LSPAF) patients. The three strategies to be evaluated are 1) ablation at sources guided by FIRMap (using RhythmView™ Workstation from TOPERA), 2) ablation at sources guided by FIRMap + conventional pulmonary vein antrum isolation (PVAI) and 3) Extended PVAI plus ablation of non-PV triggers and complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE).

Conditions

Interventions

PROCEDURE

radiofrequency catheter ablation

Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation with or without being guided by FIRMap (using RhythmView™ Workstation from TOPERA)

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Research Foundation

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Andrea Natale, MD · Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Research Foundation

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2014-04-30
Primary Completion
2016-03-31
Completion
2017-07-31

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02533843 on ClinicalTrials.gov