Standard Versus PICO Dressings in Lower-Extremity Bypass Patients
NCT02492854 · Status: TERMINATED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 8
Last updated 2021-11-04
Summary
The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of standard moist dressings and PICO single-use negative pressure dressings in post-operative lower extremity bypass patients. This study will compare the dressings' ability to decrease swelling, decrease post-operative infection, and improve mobility and quality of life measures.
Subjects will be asked to participate in this study because they will undergo a lower extremity bypass using the ipsilateral great saphenous vein. Subjects will then be randomized to two post-operative treatment groups. One group will receive standard sterile gauze and the other will receive PICO single-use negative pressure dressings. Both groups will be assessed for study measures in follow-up visits as clinically indicated up to 1 year with the 30 day timepoint as the primary outcome for study measures.
Conditions
- Of Bypass Graft of the Extremities
- Peripheral Arterial Disease
- Vascular Diseases
- Cardiovascular Diseases
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
PICO Single-Use Negative Pressure Dressings
Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT), over the past several years, has provided a way to post-operatively manage complex wounds. This is a therapy with potential to decrease rates of SSIs post-LE bypass. Unlike standard gauze dressings, negative pressure wound therapy provides a sealed, moist environment and shuttles fluid away from the wound. A suctioning unit applies even, negative pressure (typically -80 to -120 mmHg) and exudate is suctioned and collected in a control unit. The investigators would like to investigate the efficacy of PICO (Smith\&Nephew), a single-use one-step wound dressing which is effective for 7 days. It is lightweight and uses a small hand-held vacuum pump, both of which allow for ease of use. PICO has been FDA-approved.
- OTHER
-
Sterile Gauze Dressings
Current standard-of-care dressings used to cover surgical wounds post-operatively.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
collaborator INDUSTRY -
Boston Medical Center
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Jeffrey Siracuse, MD · Boston Medical Center
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 35 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2015-07-20
- Primary Completion
- 2021-01-20
- Completion
- 2021-01-20
- FDA Device
- Yes
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Supermicrosurgical Lymphvenous Bypass Intervention for Treatment
NCT05270629 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Platelet Rich Plasma Study in Lower Extremity Bypass Surgery
NCT00517452 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Feasibility Study of the TGI Adipose-derived Stromal Cell (ASC)-Coated ePTFE Vascular Graft
NCT01305863 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Feasibility Study of the ReLeaf Catheter System
NCT02462096 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
The Use of Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Device for Symptomatic Relief in Patients With Post Thrombotic Syndrome
NCT01637428 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Pilot Study to Asses the Function and Patency of Polyester-Coated Composite Bypasses From Autologous Varicose Veins
NCT00460291 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Dacron vs Dardik for Fem-Pop Bypass
NCT00523263 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Evaluation of FUSION™ Vascular Graft for Above Knee Targets
NCT01601496 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Tack Optimized Drug Coated Balloon Angioplasty Study of the Tack Endovascular System™ in Femoropoliteal Arteries
NCT02802306 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Tack Optimized Balloon Angioplasty Post-Market Study
NCT05361967 ·Status: TERMINATED
-
Evaluation of Effectiveness and Safety of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold in Routine Clinical Practice
NCT02622100 ·Status: TERMINATED
-
HEMOBLAST Pilot Clinical Investigation
NCT02502019 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1
-
The eSVS® Mesh Randomized Post-Market Study
NCT01462721 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the MAGNITUDE® Bioresorbable Drug-Eluting Scaffold in the Treatment of Patients With Below the Knee Disease in Australia
NCT06075940 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Stellarex DCB Versus Standard Balloon Angioplasty for Treatment of Below-The-Knee (BTK) Arteries
NCT03175744 ·Status: SUSPENDED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Study of Focal Implant Used for Lower Extremity Post-angioplasty Dissection
NCT05562076 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Structured Exercise Versus Endovascular Reconstruction in Post Thrombotic Syndrome
NCT05744843 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Local Paclitaxel Delivery to Prevent Restenosis in Peripheral Arterial Disease
NCT03858764 ·Status: WITHDRAWN
-
FRAME, External Support for Lower Limb Autologous Grafts
NCT04003480 ·Status: SUSPENDED ·Phase: NA
-
Zilver® Flex™ Vascular Stent Study
NCT00827619 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of All'InCath in Peripheral Vasculature Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty.
NCT05497440 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Angioplasty + SBCV vs. Angioplasty Alone for Femoropopliteal Artery Stenosis
NCT02568293 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Safety and Efficacy of the SurVeil™ Drug-Coated Balloon
NCT03241459 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) With Drug-Eluting Stents (DES) Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) for Patients With Significant Left Main Stenosis
NCT00176397 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Plaque Removal Versus Open Bypass Surgery For Critical Limb Ischemia
NCT00504088 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4