Tunnel With and Without Intramucosal Vertical Incisions
NCT02486991 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 16
Last updated 2016-12-08
Summary
Thirty patients will be treated: 15 with a coronally positioned tunnel technique plus intramucosal verticals with AlloDerm® (test treatment) and 15 with a coronally positioned tunnel technique alone with AlloDerm® (control treatment). The surgical procedure for the control sites will consist of a coronally positioned tunnel preparation that is a modification of a previous tunnel technique described by Allen AL (Allen AL, 1994a/1994b). This tunnel technique was modified to include coronal positioning of the soft tissue over an allograft (E.P Allen). The surgical procedure for the test sites will consist of a coronally positioned tunnel preparation (E.P. Allen) plus the use of mesial and/or distal intramucosal verticals, a modification of the vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access (VISTA) approach (Zadeh H, 2011). Each patient will provide at least one Miller Class I or II facial recession defect, ≥ 3 mm. Patients will be randomly selected by a coin toss to receive either the test or control treatment. Three exams for measurements will be performed per patient on total: preoperative, at week eight and 16 (4 months) postoperatively. The primary aim is to compare the percent root coverage obtained with acellular dermal matrix using the coronally positioned tunnel technique alone or with intramucosal verticals.
Conditions
- Gingival Recession
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Tunnel + AlloDerm®
A coronally positioned tunnel (CPT) technique for root coverage will be used alone with acellular dermal matrix (AlloDerm®).
- PROCEDURE
-
Tunnel + AlloDerm® + Verticals
The use of intramucosal vertical incisions in addition to a coronally positioned tunnel (CPT) technique for root coverage will be used with acellular dermal matrix (AlloDerm®).
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University of Louisville
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Henry Greenwell, DMD, MS · University of Louisville
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2015-08-31
- Primary Completion
- 2016-06-30
- Completion
- 2016-06-30
More Related Trials
-
Gain of Keratinized Mucosa Around Teeth and Dental Implants Using a Combination of Strip Gingival Graft and Acellular Dermal Matrix
NCT04920136 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment Off Gingival Recession Defects Using a Xenogenic Acellular Dermal Matrix Compared to Connective Tissue Graft.
NCT03162016 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Tunnel vs. CAF for the Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions
NCT05122468 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft Versus Acellular Dermal Matrix With Tunnel Technique in Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions
NCT02916186 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Gingival Recession Using Gingival Composite Restoration Versus Coronally Advanced Flap
NCT04584931 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Porcine Acellular Dermal Matrix for the Treatment of Localized Gingival Recessions
NCT06006780 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Coronally Advanced Tunnel Combined With Xenogenic Dermal Matrix and L-PRF
NCT06634043 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Pilot Study for Healing and Safety Outcomes in Gingival Recession
NCT04614350 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Thick vs. Thin Acellular Dermal Matrix (ADM)
NCT03392038 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Novel Vertical Y-shaped Tunnel Approach Versus Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel Technique, for The Treatment of Miller Class I Gingival Recession
NCT06453369 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Buccal Ginvigal Recessions With the Tunnel Technique in Conjunction With Cross-linked Hyaluronic Acid and Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft. A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT05436002 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Amnion Membrane Versus DFGG Using the Tunneling Technique in Management of Gingival Recession Defects.
NCT06146855 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
To Compare Two Commonly Used Soft Tissue Grafting Techniques to Achieve Coronal Flap Advancement and Root Coverage
NCT03566108 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Gingival Augmentation and Root Coverage With Superficial and Deep Cut Acellular Dermal Matrices
NCT05956496 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Partial-thickness/Non-advanced vs. Full-thickness/MCAT Tunnelling for the Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions
NCT05655247 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Comparison Between Two Surgical Techniques for the Treatment of Gingival Recessions
NCT01175720 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Root Coverage for Gingival Recessions: a Randomized Clinical Trial Using Coronally Advanced Tunnel Technique and Novomatrix®
NCT06719648 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Methods to Treat Multiple Gingival Recession Defects
NCT03124329 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Study of Root Coverage With Acellular Dermal Matrix: Puros® Dermis Versus Alloderm®
NCT00881959 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Gingival Recession With Tunnel Technique Using Connective Tissue Graft and Injectable Platelet Rich Fibrin
NCT06646432 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Different Surgical Approaches To Increase Peri-Implant Mucosa Thickness
NCT02450383 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
NovoMatrix in Gingival Recession Coverage: Case Series
NCT06409468 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparation Between Two Surgical Techniques With Acellular Dermal Matrix in Treatment of Gingival Recessions
NCT02774967 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Microneedling on Coverage of RT1 Gingival Recession in Thin Phenotype.
NCT06432439 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Root Coverage Comparing Suturing Techniques
NCT01901822 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA