A Comparison of Robot-assisted Single Site and Laparoscopic Single-incision Cholecystectomy for Benign Gallbladder
NCT02485392 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60
Last updated 2016-09-09
Summary
A single-blinded randomized clinical trial (RCT) designed to compare Single-Site robot-assisted with single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The study directly compares both surgical approaches in a cohort of 60 patients (30 patients in each arm) with benign gallbladder disease from the Department of Surgery at the Cantonal Hospital of Winterthur (Kantonsspital Winterthur) in Switzerland. The primary endpoint of the study is the surgeon's physical and mental stress load at the time of surgery and is assessed by validated Local Experienced Discomfort (LED) and Subjective Mental Effort Questionnaire (SMEQ) visual analogue scales. The secondary endpoints include costs of the procedure, intra-operative blood loss, operating time, intra-operative conversion rate and additional trocar placement, complications, length of hospital stay, Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and cosmesis. HRQoL and cosmesis will be assessed using the validated Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) and the Body Image Questionnaires (BIQ), respectively. The inclusion criteria cover most notably symptomatic cholecystolithiasis, chronic cholecystitis, benign gallbladder polyps and age ≥18 years. The exclusion criteria are, among others, acute cholecystitis, emergency cholecystectomy, previous extensive upper abdominal surgery and suspicion of malignant disease. Non-stratified block randomization (random block sizes 2 and 4) will be used to achieve balance in the allocation of participants to both treatments arms and prevent a premature decoding of the randomization scheme. Hereby, the patient will not be informed about the group assignment until the last outpatient follow-up and only after he/she has completed and returned all required questionnaires (GIQLI and BIQ). The operation will be performed according to the group assignment by senior surgeons only who have a wide experience in both robotic Single-Site and conventional single-incision laparoscopy. All data are recorded safely using the SecuTrialTM program. Sample-size calculations are based on the results of the previously mentioned experimental setup by Schatte et al, utilizing an estimated effect size of 0.8, at a power of 0.8 and an alpha-error level of 0.05, as well as considering a potential additional error margin of 10-15% of the calculations (G-Power 3.1 software, Heinrich-Heine University Duesseldorf/Germany). The estimated total duration of the study is 1.5 years, including the scheduled 1-month and 1-year postoperative follow-up visits. The study will be carried out in accordance with principles enunciated in the current version of the Declaration of Helsinki, the guidelines of Good Clinical Practice (GCP) issued by International Conference on Harmonization (ICH), and Swiss regulatory authority's requirements.
Conditions
- Benign Gallbladder Disease
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Da Vinci Single Site Robot-Assisted Cholecystectomy
- DEVICE
-
Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Kantonsspital Winterthur KSW
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Stefan Breitenstein, MD · Kantonsspital Winterthur KSW
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2015-07-31
- Primary Completion
- 2016-07-31
- Completion
- 2017-07-31
Countries
- Switzerland
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Safety and Efficacy Study of Transumbilical Laparoendoscopic Single Site Cholecystectomy
NCT01383031 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Technical Feasibility of Routine Intraoperative Cholangiography During Elective Rigid-hybrid Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT01583348 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Prospective Evaluation of the Ability of Spyglass Cholangioscopy to Facilitate Radiation Free ERCP
NCT03074201 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Evaluation of Laparoendoscopic Single Site Versus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT00961506 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study of 3D Laparoscopy Versus Endoscopy in the Treatment of Choledocholithiasis
NCT04658212 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Trial of Wire and Sphincterotome Systems for Biliary Cannulation
NCT02197338 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Study Investigating the Best Method of Treatment of Bile Duct Stones in Higher Risk Patients
NCT00612846 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Laser Versus Mechanical Lithotripsy of Bile Duct Stones
NCT01759979 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Evaluation of Residual Bile Duct Stone by Peroral Cholangioscopy After Conventional ERCP
NCT03482375 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
RCT on Robotic vs. Endo-laparoscopic Approach for Difficult Choledocholithiasis
NCT05611840 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
SpyGlass Versus ESWL for Large Common Bile Duct Stones
NCT05186350 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Complicated Hepatolithiasis
NCT03297099 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Cholecystectomy First vs Sequential Common Bile Duct Imaging + Cholecystectomy
NCT01492790 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Pre and Intraoperative ERCP in Treatment of Common Bile Duct Stones
NCT01046552 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cosmesis and Body Image After Single Port or 4-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT01278472 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of 8.5 F Plastic Stent Without Proximal Flap on Prevention of Post-ERCP Cholangitis
NCT02594891 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laser Lithotripsy for Difficult Large Bile Duct Stones
NCT02538731 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
ChOlanGiography Performed Routinely Versus Selectively During Cholecystectomy: A NAtional Registry-based Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT07002619 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Goff Transpancreatic Septotomy vs. Double Wire Technique for Achieving Biliary Access in Technically Challenging ERCPs
NCT03118973 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pre-cut Versus Intentional Double Guidewire for ERCP Cannulation: Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT07329803 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Intra-gallbladder or Systemic Indocyanide Green Injection Facilitate Cholecystectomy.
NCT03024892 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Role of the Right Portal Pedicle and Rouviere's Sulcus as an Anatomic Landmark in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT02133027 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Duodenoscope With Single-use Distal Cover and the Conventional Reusable Duodenoscope
NCT05429203 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Winged Versus Traditional Plastic Stents for Biliary Drainage
NCT06960733 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Radio Frequency Ablation in the Management of Pancreatico-biliary Disorders: A Multicenter Registry
NCT01439698 ·Status: UNKNOWN