Midazolam With Meperidine and Dexmedetomidine vs. Midazolam With Meperidine and Propofol for Sedation During ERCP
NCT02475824 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 258
Last updated 2018-04-06
Summary
This is a single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blinded study of consecutive patients referred for ERCP. A recent study suggested that the addition of dexmedetomidine to the midazolam-meperidine regimen (MMD)provided better sedative efficacy and a superior safety profile during ERCP compared with a midazolam-meperidine regimen. Further study is warranted to compare an MMD regimen with propofol-based regimen.
Randomization is performed by use of a computer-generated random allocations in a ratio of 1:1 in balanced blocks of 4. A separate sedating nurse, who don't participate in the study, is the only person with knowledge of the sedation regimen. This separate nurse repeated the injection of propofol and completed questionnaires.
Conditions
- Complication
Interventions
- DRUG
-
Midazolam®
midazolam (0.05 mg/kg, 30% reduction for patients if age ≥70 or ASA class III-IV; Bukwang Pharm Co., Seoul, Republic of Korea)
- DRUG
-
"Meperidine" (pethidine®)
Meperidine (50mg. 25mg for patients aged ≥70 years; pethidine HCL, Hana Pharm Co., Seoul, Republic of Korea).
- DRUG
-
Propofol®
Repeated doses of 10-20 mg propofol are titrated to achieve the target level of sedation.
- DRUG
-
Dexmedetomidine (Precedex®)
Dexmedetomidine (1μg/kg/h, Precedex; Hospira, Seoul, Republic of Korea) or the same volume of normal saline were administered in the MMD and midazolam-meperidine group
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Dankook University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Jun Ho Choi, MD · Dankook University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 80 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2015-05-31
- Primary Completion
- 2016-11-30
- Completion
- 2017-01-30
Countries
- South Korea
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Dexmedetomidine vs Propofol in High-Risk ERCP Patients
NCT07166614 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Dexmedetomidine Versus Ketofol for Moderate Sedation in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
NCT06212401 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Sedation by Dexmedetomidine and Propofol
NCT02993718 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effects of Different Loading Doses of Dexmedetomidine on The Bispectral Index-Guided Propofol Sedation in Patients Undergoing Advanced Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Procedures: A Randomized Control Study
NCT06414395 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Dexmedetomidine-ketamine Combination Versus Fentanyl-midazolam During Bronchoscopy
NCT06185127 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Effect of Sedatives on Regional Cerebral Oxygen Saturation
NCT02966743 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparision of Midazolam-dexmedetomidine With Dexmedetomidine Alone for Hemodynamic Stability and Quality of Sedation in Elderly Patients Under Spinal Anesthesia
NCT01979653 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Dexmedetomidine Versus Midazolam Versus a Combination of the Two as a Premedication for Children Undergoing Bilateral Myringotomy Tube Insertion
NCT02134327 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Dexmedetomidine vs. Ketorolac/ Midazolam for Retinal Surgery
NCT03143244 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Dexmedetomidine and Remifentanil in NORA
NCT06403670 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Adjunct Sedatives in Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Procedures
NCT00937924 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Using Precedex and Other Sedatives
NCT01169467 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
The Effect of Remifentanil-dexmedetomidine Compared With Remifentanil-midazolam on Patient's Satisfaction
NCT02929095 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol for Sedation During Awake Endotracheal Intubation
NCT04753515 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Dexmedetomidine for Postoperative Sedation in Patients Undergoing Repair of Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms
NCT00409344 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Safety and Efficacy of Dexmedetomidate vs. Midazolam for Procedural Sedation During Medical Thoracoscopy
NCT07184801 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE3
-
A Comparison of Efficacy and Safety During Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Between Dexmedetomidine-remifentanil and Propofol-remifentanil
NCT01920113 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of Sedative Drugs for Conscious Sedation During Ultrasound Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration
NCT02157818 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Dexmedetomidine vs Midazolam for Intraoperative Sedation
NCT02878837 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Effects of Dexmedetomidine vs Propofol in Patients With Intra-abdominal Sepsis
NCT04718714 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Dexmedetomidine Versus Ketamine Versus Midazolam in Endoscopic Procedures
NCT04597268 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Dexmedetomidine Versus Midazolam for Continuous Sedation in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU)
NCT00481312 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol in Vitreoretinal Surgery
NCT01001429 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Dexmedetomidine for Attenuation of Pressor Response
NCT06592027 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol for Prolonged Sedation in Critically Ill Trauma and Surgical Patients
NCT02548923 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4