Comparison of Two Liver Dialysis Systems : MARS Versus SPAD in Severe Liver Failure

NCT02310542 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 34

Last updated 2025-09-11

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

A critical issue of the clinical syndrome in liver failure is the accumulation of toxins not cleared by the failing liver. Based on this hypothesis, albumin dialysis is used to remove those substances. Albumin dialysis with recirculation (MARS) is the most used system but required specific system and expert environment. Alternative system without recirculation (SPAD) is less expensive and can be realised in critical care services trained to extrarenal epuration. The primary objective of this study is to compare biological and clinical efficacy, pulsatility index of middle cerebral artery modification and tolerance of both systems.

This is a prospective, open, cross-over comparative study of two albumin dialysis system. Each patient will receive the two systems in an randomly assessed order. Patients are divided up according to bilirubin plasmatic level. (250µmol/L to 400 µmol/L and \>400µmol/L).

Conditions

  • Liver Failure, Acute
  • Chronic Hepatic Failure

Interventions

DEVICE

MARS albumin dialysis system

DEVICE

SPAD albumin dialysis system

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Hospices Civils de Lyon

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Serge Duperret, MD · Hospices Civils de Lyon

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
CROSSOVER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2011-12-31
Primary Completion
2017-09-30
Completion
2017-09-30

Countries

  • France

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02310542 on ClinicalTrials.gov