TEOSYAL® RHA Global Action, TEOSYAL® RHA Deep Lines, and Juvéderm® Ultra XC for the Correction of Nasolabial Folds
NCT02195427 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 148
Last updated 2018-04-25
Summary
The purpose of this study is 1) to compare the effectiveness and safety of TEOSYAL® RHA Global Action versus Juvéderm® Ultra XC, and 2) to compare the effectiveness and safety of TEOSYAL® RHA Deep Lines versus Juvéderm® Ultra XC, in the treatment of moderate to severe nasolabial folds.
Conditions
- Nasolabial Folds, Wrinkles
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
TEOSYAL® RHA Global Action
A sterile, biodegradable, biocompatible, viscoelastic, clear, colorless, homogenized gel implant. It consists of cross-linked hyaluronic acid produced by fermentation of Streptococcus equi bacteria, formulated to a concentration of 23 mg/mL and 0.3% w/w lidocaine in a physiologic buffer. It is supplied in individual treatment syringes with 30G1/2" disposable sterile needles.
- DEVICE
-
TEOSYAL® RHA Deep Lines
A sterile, biodegradable, biocompatible, viscoelastic, clear, colorless, homogenized gel implant. It consists of cross-linked hyaluronic acid produced by fermentation of Streptococcus equi bacteria, formulated to a concentration of 23 mg/mL and 0.3% w/w lidocaine in a physiologic buffer. It is supplied in individual treatment syringes with 27G1/2" disposable sterile needles.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
ethica Clinical Research Inc.
collaborator INDUSTRY -
Teoxane SA
lead INDUSTRY
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 22 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2014-06-30
- Primary Completion
- 2015-03-31
- Completion
- 2016-03-31
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
TEOSYAL RHA® 1 for the Correction of Moderate to Severe Tissue Volume Deficiency in the Infraorbital Region in Chinese Adults
NCT06749587 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Teosyal RHA® Histology and Intradermal Implantation Evaluation Study
NCT04846530 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Study of JTM104 Injection vs. Juvederm in Treating Moderate to Severe Nasolabial Folds
NCT07265791 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Medical Device Pivotal Study to Injection With SkinPlus-HYAL Implant Lidocaine vs RESTYLANE Lidocaine in of Nasolabial Folds
NCT06305520 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Safety of Radiesse for the Correction of Moderate to Severe Nasolabial Folds
NCT04647721 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
RHA® 4 NLF Cannula
NCT04754646 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Trial of YYD701-2 for Treatment of Nasolabial Folds
NCT03170050 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Safety Study of TPX-121 on Nasolabial Folds
NCT06533540 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Efficacy and Safety of Injection With VINCI Plus Hyaluronic Acid Filler
NCT01918839 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Safety and Efficacy Study of Isolagen TherapyTM in the Treatment of Nasolabial Fold Wrinkles
NCT00649428 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Comparative Study of Reconstituted JUVÉDERM® Ultra vs COSMODERM® 1 for Lip and Cheek Lines, Folds or Wrinkles
NCT01212809 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Safety and Effectiveness Evaluation of TEOSYAL® TPVM Versus COMPARATOR for the Remodeling of the Lower Face
NCT05986630 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy and Safety of Restylane Perlane Compared to Restylane for Correction of Moderate and Severe Nasolabial Folds
NCT02432742 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Restylane Defyne Compared to Restylane for Correction of Moderate to Severe Nasolabial Folds
NCT03003130 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparative Analysis of Two Hyaluronic Acid Fillers for Nasolabial Fold Correction
NCT06351293 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pivotal Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Injection With LASBEAU Strong in Correction of Nasolabial Folds
NCT06310863 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Safety and Performance of DKL Crosslinked Sodium Hyaluronate 23 Dermal Filler for Improvement of NLF Appearance
NCT05021913 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness and Safety Comparison of Lunaphil Ultra (Hyaluronic Acid, by Espad Pharmed Co.) Versus Juvederm Ultra 4® (Hyaluronic Acid, by Allergan Co.) in Nasolabial Folds (NLFs) Management
NCT06509477 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Purpose of This Study is the Demonstration of Safety and Efficacy of the Dermal Fillers DXP01 Temporary Improvement of Moderate to Severe Nasolabial Folds
NCT06885775 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Multicenter Double-Blind Randomized Split-Face Study to Evaluate Revanesse® Ultra vs Restylane® for Correction of NLF
NCT02987205 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pain and Safety of Restylane With and Without Lidocaine for Correction of Moderate and Severe Nasolabial Folds
NCT02918721 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
To Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of 'BRDE33-100' for the Temporary Correction of Moderate to Severe Nasolabial Folds
NCT07069920 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
DL6049 Versus Cosmoplast in the Treatment of Nasolabial Fold Wrinkles, Long Term Follow-up
NCT00444353 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
To Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Injection With HARA as Compared to Restylane® Lidocaine in Temporary Correction of Nasolabial Folds
NCT04224649 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy and Safety Study of SkinPlus-Hyal® to Nasolabial Fold
NCT01940575 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA