A Randomised Controlled Trial of Remifentanil Intravenous Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCA) Versus Intramuscular Pethidine for Pain Relief in Labour

NCT02179294 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 401

Last updated 2018-10-15

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Childbirth can be an extremely painful and the provision of pain relief during labour is a vital component of a positive maternal experience. The majority of women who deliver in modern obstetric units choose a pharmacological method of pain relief, including Entonox, the injection of opioids or epidural placement. The commonest opioid used in labour is pethidine administered by intramuscular (im) injection. The effectiveness of pain relief provided by pethidine has long been challenged. Its shortcomings are more serious when set against known side effects including maternal sedation, nausea and potential transfer across the placenta to the foetus. More than a third of women who receive pethidine subsequently require an epidural due to inadequate pain relief. Epidurals provide highly effective pain relief, but increase the risk of a forceps or suction delivery resulting in prolonged hospital stay. Therefore, there is a clear need for a safe, effective, easy to administer analgesic alternative.

Conditions

  • Pain Relief in Labour

Interventions

DRUG

Pethidine

100mg by intramuscular injection, up to 4 hourly in frequency (up to a maximum of 4 doses). The maximum dose being 400mg in 24 hours.

DRUG

Remifentanil

Dedicated intravenous cannula for remifentanil administration PCA protocol * PCA bolus remifentanil 40 μg * Lockout interval 2 minutes In the event of excess sedation being recorded by regular observation of respiratory function, the regimen will be altered by reduction of the remifentanil bolus dose to 30 μg with a lock-out interval of 2 minutes.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Heartlands Hospital

    collaborator UNKNOWN
  • Good Hope Hospital

    collaborator UNKNOWN
  • Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust

    collaborator OTHER_GOV
  • York Hospital

    collaborator UNKNOWN
  • University Hospital of North Midlands

    collaborator UNKNOWN
  • Frimley Park Hospital

    collaborator UNKNOWN
  • Bradford Royal Infirmary

    collaborator OTHER
  • Stoke Mandeville Hospital

    collaborator UNKNOWN
  • Clinical Research and Trials Unit (Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital, UK)

    collaborator OTHER
  • Medway Maritime Hospital

    collaborator UNKNOWN
  • Northwick Park Hospital

    collaborator OTHER
  • Homerton University Hospital

    collaborator UNKNOWN
  • City Hospital Birmingham

    collaborator UNKNOWN
  • Warwick Hospital

    collaborator UNKNOWN
  • University Hospital Coventry

    collaborator UNKNOWN
  • University of Birmingham

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Matthew JA Wilson · Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
16 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2014-05-31
Primary Completion
2016-09-30
Completion
2016-09-30

Countries

  • United Kingdom

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02179294 on ClinicalTrials.gov