Fosfomycin Versus Meropenem or Ceftriaxone in Bacteriemic Infections Caused by Multidrug Resistance in E.Coli

NCT02142751 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 161

Last updated 2019-08-06

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Enterobacterieaceae (and specially Escherichia coli) showing resistance due to multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli, plasmid mediated AmpC or quinolone resistance caused by chromosomal mechanisms have spread worldwide during the last decades. This is important because many of these isolates are also resistant to other first-line agents such as fluoroquinolones or aminoglycosides, leaving few available options for therapy, and this condition is associated with increased morbidity- mortality and length of hospital stay. While carbapenems are considered the drugs of choice for multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli and AmpC producers, recent data suggests that certain alternatives may be suitable for some types of infections.

At the present time, finding therapeutic alternatives to carbapenems and cephalosporins for the treatment of invasive infections due to multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli is critical. Fosfomycin was discovered more than 40 years ago but was not investigated according to present standards, and thus is not used in clinical practice except in desperate situations. It is one of the so-considered neglected antibiotics with high potential interest for the future.

With the aim of demonstrate the clinical non-inferiority of intravenous fosfomycin compared to meropenem or ceftriaxone in the treatment of bacteraemic urinary tract infections caused by multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli . The investigators propose a "real practise" randomised, controlled, multicentre phase III clinical trial to compare the clinical and microbiological efficacy and safety of intravenous fosfomycin (4 grammes every 6 hours) with meropenem (1 gramme every 8 hours) or ceftriaxone (1 gramme every 24 hours) as targeted therapy of the previously specified infection; change to oral therapy according to predefined options is allowed in both arms after 5 days. Follow-up for the study is planned up to 60 days.

Conditions

  • Infection Due to ESBL Escherichia Coli

Interventions

DRUG

Fosfomycin sodium intravenous

4g every 6 hours iv (60 min infusion)

DRUG

Meropenem intravenous

1g every 8 hours (15-30 min infusion) It depends on strain sensitivity: Strain with resistance to cephalosporins

DRUG

Ceftriaxone intravenous

1g every 24 hours iv (2-4 min infusion) It depends on strain sensitivity: Strain with resistance to quinolone but sensitivity to cephalosporins

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases

    collaborator OTHER
  • Fundación Pública Andaluza para la gestión de la Investigación en Sevilla

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • JESUS RODRIGUEZ-BAÑO, MD, PhD · Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2014-07-31
Primary Completion
2018-12-31
Completion
2019-03-31

Countries

  • Spain

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02142751 on ClinicalTrials.gov