MedTrace Logo

Comparison of Intraosseous Anaesthesia Using a Computerized System (QuickSleeper) to Conventional Anesthesia

NCT02084433 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 158

Last updated 2017-02-23

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose is to compare the efficacy of an intraosseous anaesthesia using a computerized system (QuickSleeper) to a conventional infiltration anesthesia. Our hypothesis is that anesthesia via QuickSleeper system can reduce pain during anesthesia and obtain a more rapid local anesthesia compared to the anesthesia via conventional technique by infiltration.

Design: split-mouth design AND parallel-arm design

Conditions

  • Deep Caries
  • Molar Incisor Hypomineralisation

Interventions

PROCEDURE

intraosseous anaesthesia using a computerized system

"1 / Anesthesia of periosteum (Articaine 1/100000) 2 / penetration of the needle rotated to the apex 3 / osteocentral injection "

PROCEDURE

conventional anasthesia

para-apical maxillary and locoregional mandibular (Articaine 1/100000) anaesthesia

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Frédéric Courson, PhD · Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
7 Years
Max Age
15 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2015-01-31
Primary Completion
2017-02-28
Completion
2017-02-28

Countries

  • France

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02084433 on ClinicalTrials.gov