Lung Expansion Technics on Chest Wall Mechanics and Preventing Pulmonary Complication After Abdominal Surgery

NCT01993602 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 171

Last updated 2016-03-08

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The lung expansion techniques are widely used to prevent postoperative pulmonary complications. However, the effect of each technique on thoracoabdominal mechanics after abdominal surgery and if it influences the rate of postoperative pulmonary complications remains unknown. The investigators hypothesis is that the lung expansion technique that more increases lung volume after abdominal surgery, will be the most efficient in preventing postoperative pulmonary complication after abdominal surgery. The investigators objectives will be to compare the effect of different lung expansion techniques on lung volumes and activation of inspiratory muscle, and prevention of pulmonary complications in patients undergoing upper abdominal surgery. This study will involve 171 patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery. Patients will be randomly divided into 5 groups: no therapy group (n=35), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP, n=34); volumetric incentive spirometry (VIS, n=34); flow oriented incentive spirometry (FIS, n=33) and deep breathing (DB, n=35). The thoracoabdominal mechanics will be assessed before and 3 days after surgery. Complications will be evaluated by a researcher who did not know to which group each patient belongs.

Conditions

  • Surgical Procedure, Unspecified

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Breathing exercises

The intervention groups (CPAP, VIS, FIS and DB) used the specific device (or not) according to the group allocation. The intervention was performed 3 times per day, from 1 to 5 postoperative day. Patients performed 5 sets of 10 repetitions of the specific breathing exercise, with 30 seconds rest between each set. The sessions were held in the morning, early afternoon and early evening, always supervised by a physiotherapist. Before starting each session, the patient reported the sensation of pain, and if he quantify pain intensity more than 3 in the visual numeric scale (0 to 10) was asked the doctor to administer analgesics aiming that him to perform properly the breathing exercise.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo

    collaborator OTHER_GOV
  • University of Sao Paulo General Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Celso R Carvalho, PhD · School of Medicine of University of Sao Paulo

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2011-01-31
Primary Completion
2013-10-31
Completion
2013-10-31

Countries

  • Brazil

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01993602 on ClinicalTrials.gov