MedTrace Logo

Monolithic Zirconia Full-Mouth Implant Supported Rehabilitation Behavior

NCT01974362 · Status: RECRUITING · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 90

Last updated 2026-05-04

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

In patients that did a full mouth implant supported rehabilitation does Cad/Cam Monolithic Zirconia compared to Cad/Cam Zirconia Suprastructure (zirconium oxide (Yttrium - partially stabilized with tetragonal polycrystalline structure) veneered with feldspathic ceramic, has less post-insertion complications after at least 1-Year follow-up ?

Conditions

  • Endosseous Dental Implant Failure
  • Accident Caused by Broken Ceramic

Interventions

DEVICE

Dental Implant

Place dental implants in both jaws (maxilla and mandible) according to manufacturer specifications

DEVICE

Monolithic Zirconia (MZ)

rehabilitation with monolithic zirconia implant-prosthesis with bucal feldspathic veneer

DEVICE

Zirconia-Feldspathic (PVZ)

restore dental implants with a zirconia suprastructure and feldspathic veneers

DEVICE

Monolithic Zirconia (FCMZ)

Full contour full arch zirconia rehabilitation

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Implantology Institute

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • João Caramês, Phd · Implantology Institute

  • Artur Simões, Msc · Implantology Institute

  • Duarte Marques, Msc · Implantology Institute

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2014-01-31
Primary Completion
2028-01-01
Completion
2029-12-31

Countries

  • Portugal

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01974362 on ClinicalTrials.gov