Single Incision Pelvic Floor Mesh Implants
NCT01909700 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 157
Last updated 2016-05-05
Summary
Objectives: To evaluate whether the use of single incision un-anchored small mesh implants is feasible, safe and effective for women with moderate pelvic organ prolapse.
Design: Patients diagnosed with moderate pelvic organ prolapse were enrolled to undergo a single incision un-anchored mesh operation. Follow-up was 4 to 23 months. The outcome measures for this study were the operative safety and post-operative pain, adverse effects and anatomical as well as functional cure.
Setting: The operations were performed under general anesthesia according with the reported surgical techniques at university and private hospitals.
Conditions
- Intra-operative Complications
- Post Operative Complications
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Single Incision Mesh
Single Incision Mesh is implanted for pelvic floor reconstruction
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Western Galilee Hospital-Nahariya
lead OTHER_GOV
Principal Investigators
-
Menahem Neuman, Prof. · Western Galilee MC Nahariya
Study Design
- Allocation
- NA
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- SINGLE_GROUP
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 30 Years
- Max Age
- 90 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2011-07-31
- Primary Completion
- 2011-11-30
- Completion
- 2012-02-29
Countries
- Israel
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Sacro-Spinous Ligaments Anterior Apical Anchoring
NCT01842464 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
A Large Multi-Center Database of Women Who Have Had and Are Going to Have Surgical Correction of Their Pelvic Organ Prolapse Using the Gynecare Prolift System
NCT01134003 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Credibility of Ultrasound Detection of Female Genital Prolapse Mesh
NCT06000215 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of the Apyx™ Device for the Repair of Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP)
NCT03991455 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Vaginal Prolapse Surgery Accompanied by Mid Urethral Sling Versus no Sling for Reduction of Postoperative Incontinence
NCT04251923 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
GYNECARE PROSIMA* Procedure Versus Modified Total Pelvic Floor Reconstructive Surgery for Uterine Prolapse Stage III
NCT01396109 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Factors Affecting the Improvement of Severity of Concomitant USI After a Novel TVM Surgery for Women With POP
NCT03607968 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy Versus Modified Total Pelvic Floor Reconstructive Surgery for Apical Prolapse Stage III-IV
NCT01762384 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Prolift Versus IVS for Pelvic Floor Prolapse
NCT01383291 ·Status: WITHDRAWN
-
ACell MatriStem Pelvic Floor Matrix Versus Native Tissue Repair, Comparative Study
NCT02021279 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of the GYNECARE PROLIFT + M* Pelvic Floor Repair System as a Device for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT00833001 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair With or Without Concomitant Burch Colposuspension in Patients With Urinary Incontinence
NCT00576004 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Anatomical and Functional Outcomes of Perigee and Apogee Mesh in Total Pelvic Floor Reconstruction Versus Gynecare Prolift
NCT03070873 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Outcomes and Urodynamic Effects After Vaginal Tailored Mesh Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT02178735 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Mesh-Free Versus Mesh-Based Surgery for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Prospective Comparison of Pubo-Urethral Ligament Plication and Transobturator Tape
NCT07290114 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Long-term Evaluation of the I-STOP Sling in Stress Urinary Incontinence Treatment
NCT06665698 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Retropubic vs. Single-Incision Mid-Urethral Sling for Stress Urinary Incontinence
NCT03520114 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Anterior Vaginal Wall Repair With Mesh in Combination With TVT-O to Reduce Urinary Stress Incontinence
NCT01507714 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
the Anatomical Reduction and Functional Recovery Effects of Two Transvaginal Apical Slings on Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT05189665 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
GYNECARE PROSIMA* Pelvic Floor Repair System for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT00521066 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Effect of a Risk Calculator on Patient Satisfaction With the Decision for Midurethral Sling During Prolapse Surgery
NCT02111642 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pessary Experience Study
NCT06021769 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
A Multi-center Registry Study: The Follow-up the Complications for Trans-vaginal Mesh Surgery
NCT04025047 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
the Indications and Clinical Efficacy of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery
NCT02599311 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
The Development of De-novo Stress Urinary Incontinence After Stage II-III Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery
NCT03221725 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA